Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    PARSHAS DEVARIM CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF CHINUCH CONCESSIONS

    The idea was
    good in my eyes.
    (1:23)
    Parashas
    Devarim begins
    with Moshe rabbeinu
    reviewing the main events that occurred
    in the 39 years since the Jewish People
    left Har Sinai. In recalling their request
    to send meraglim (spies) to reconnoiter
    Eretz Yisrael before proceeding to the
    Land, Moshe castigates them for the
    disorderly manner with which they made
    their request, but he concedes that “the
    idea was good in my eyes.”
    The Talmud (Sotah 34b) deduces from
    Moshe’s statement — “The idea was
    good in my eyes” — that he felt that it
    was a good idea to send meraglim,
    but Hashem did not. Hashem was aware
    that sending spies would end in disaster,
    and He did not want them to go.
    This is difficult to understand.
    If Hashem knew that the meraglim

    would end up poisoning the minds of the
    nation against Eretz Yisrael, why did He
    agree that they could go? Hashem should
    have told Moshe, “Tell them that I am
    God, I call the shots, and I said ‘NO!’”?
    Rabbi Mottel Katz, the late Rosh
    Yeshivah of Telz in Cleveland, Ohio,
    deduces an important lesson in chinuch
    from this incident.
    There are times that children want to do
    something that their parents deem
    inappropriate. Our parental instincts tell
    us to lay down the law and prohibit them
    from doing what they want to do. We
    reason to ourselves that we are required
    to be mechanech (educate) our children,
    and sometimes this means that we have
    to say, “No.”
    But is it always right to say no?
    We learn from the meraglim, says
    Rabbi Katz, that there are times that we
    have to concede, even if we know that
    what our children want to do is wrong!
    Hashem realized that the people simply

    were not ready to accept His denial
    of their request. Had Moshe returned
    from Hashem with a negative
    response, they would have thought
    to themselves, “How are we
    supposed to go and fight against a
    country without sending spies?
    Everyone knows that you do not
    fight without intelligence
    information.”

    Had Klal Yisrael been on a high-
    enough spiritual level to accept Hashem’s

    refusal, He would have said no.
    But Hashem realized they were not
    ready to accept His decision
    wholeheartedly, so He did not refuse
    their request.
    Sometimes, notes Rabbi Katz, chinuch
    is all about conceding. We have to know
    when our children are able to accept a
    “no,” and when they are just too set on
    doing what they intend to do to accept
    our refusal.
    This concept is actually mentioned
    clearly in the Talmud (Yevamos
    65b) as well: “Just as it is
    a mitzvah to say words that will be
    accepted, it is also a mitzvah not to
    say words that will not be
    accepted.”
    Rabbi Mottel Katz adds a personal
    anecdote that is so incredible that,
    had I not seen it myself in his notes
    and confirmed the authenticity of
    the notes with his son, I would
    never have included it here. The
    incident that he describes, while
    not dated, must have occurred in
    the late 1940s or early 50s.
    “One day, the boys came over to
    me in yeshivah and asked me to
    change the yeshivah schedule for
    one night,” writes Rabbi Katz.
    “They wanted to daven Maariv
    earlier than we regularly did.
    “When I asked them why they
    wanted to daven early, they
    explained that there was a
    heavyweight championship bout
    being fought in New York that
    night, and they wanted to listen to
    the match on the radio. If we
    would daven at the regular time,
    they would miss the fight.”
    “Of course the very request was
    inappropriate, not to mention the
    questionable propriety of yeshivah
    students listening to a fight between

    two humans trained to beat each other
    until one of them could no longer stand
    up.”
    “I realized that if I refused, the boys
    simply would not understand why I
    refused. Having grown up in America,
    they were accustomed to the finest, most
    respectable citizens flying in from all
    over the country to view these matches.
    They considered watching or listening to
    the radio broadcast of two adults
    pummeling each other a perfectly normal
    means of recreation.”
    “I decided,” concludes Rabbi Katz,
    “that since these boys would not begin to
    understand why I was refusing their
    request, it would be better to allow them
    to daven early and listen to the match.”
    I am sure that this was probably one of
    many difficult dilemmas Rabbi Katz had
    to face. He had learned in Telz back in
    Europe. What would his Roshei Yeshivah
    have thought of such a request?
    Rabbi Mordechai Gifter often related
    his memories of his arrival in Telz and
    finding that the only thing that existed
    there was Torah. How difficult it must
    have been for a person who had been
    privy to witness such exalted devotion to
    Torah to permit his students to end their
    studies early for a heavyweight
    championship match.
    But this was a new world. The student
    body of Telz at the time was culled from
    various small communities throughout
    the United States; many of them had
    attended public elementary schools in
    their youth. They could not be expected
    to fully appreciate the value of Torah.
    Of course, there are many cases in
    which parents and mechanchim have to
    say no. But in this case, Rav Mottel
    learned from the best Teacher.
    If Hashem permitted Klal Yisrael to do
    something that He knew was wrong
    when He realized they could not accept
    His refusal, then the Rosh Yeshivah of
    Telz had to find it in himself to do the

    same.

    And so, dear parents, must we.