Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    KEDOSHIM: STOP JUDGING ME CHALLENGING OUR INSTINCT TO CONDEMN

    Judge Favorably
    This week’s parsha,
    Kedoshim, contains a
    commandment, which
    we often do not think
    about as such: “With
    Justice you shall judge

    your fellow man.”
    The Talmud gives two different interpretations
    for this verse. According to one opinion, this
    verse is giving direction to Judges. When a
    person comes to a Judgment in a civil case
    according to Torah law the judge must treat the
    litigants equally. He is not allowed to have one
    litigant stand and the other one sit, one speak at
    length and the other urged to speak briefly, and
    so forth. However, according to a second
    interpretation in the Talmud, the injunction in
    this verse is directed at every Jew. Its intent is
    that we must “judge our fellow with justice,” as
    the Talmud puts it, “Judge your fellow man to
    the side of merit.”
    A similar expression we find in Pirkei
    Avot: “You should judge every person to the
    side of merit.”
    But what does this mean?
    Changing the Instinct to Condemn
    On the most basic level, it cautions us to give
    people the benefit of the doubt. If we see a
    person doing something that apparently seems
    to be an act that he or she should not be doing,
    there is a full-fledged Biblical command to give
    him the benefit of the doubt.
    Upon observing another person doing or
    saying something we perceive as undesirable or
    destructive, many of us instinctively assume
    that negative motives are compelling these acts
    and words. We naturally believe that the person
    is aware of the damage he is creating, and
    despite this he is doing it for his own benefit or
    some agenda. This attitude has plagued us for
    millennia and has caused untold harm and
    divisiveness in communities. Learn to judge
    people favorably, to attribute positive, or at least
    neutral, motives to people’s acts and words. Say
    to yourself, “His (or her) behavior might appear
    wrong; but in his own mind and heart he really
    thinks he is doing the right thing.”
    This approach of condemning the behavior,
    but not the person is counterintuitive, but it is
    tremendously beneficial for two reasons:
    A) When you are able to alter your attitude,
    you will not become resentful. When you
    attribute evil motives to a person performing a
    negative act, your brain instinctively swells
    with negative energy. On the other hand, if you
    train yourself to view the person, unlike his
    behavior, in a positive light, you save your heart
    from being consumed by ire.
    B) You will be in a much better position to
    communicate your feelings to this person
    without compelling him to construct defense
    mechanisms and reciprocate your rebuke with
    stubbornness and anger. When he feels that
    inside your heart you don’t view him as a “bad
    guy” who craves destruction, only as a “good
    guy” who made an error, your criticism will
    most likely be more effective.
    Think about yourself. If someone approaches
    you and criticizes your behavior, when is he
    more likely to be successful? When he attributes
    negative motives to you, or positive ones to

    you? The answer is more than obvious. This
    means that if you are truly bothered by what this
    person did, the best way to eliminate such
    behavior in the future is to judge him or her
    favorably.
    The Blind Chazzan
    The composer and story-teller Reb Shlomeleh
    Carlebach told a story of a Shabbat spent in a
    community in post-war Europe. When he came
    to shul on Shabbat, he was disappointed with the
    cantor. The man was skipping words, had a
    feeble, timorous voice. Worse still, his
    pronunciation of the Hebrew text was
    dreadful. Carlebach thought to himself that the
    horrible cantor must have paid off the synagogue
    to let him pray… he was so disgusted, he
    decided to go to a side room and pray alone. He
    would only come to the main shul to listen to the
    Torah reading.
    When he returned for the Torah reading, he
    noticed that the cantor holding the Torah and
    leading it to the bimah was being supported by
    two people. As he looked closer, he realized that
    the chazzan was blind.
    Shlomoleh asked the person near him who this
    chazzan was. The man explained: Before the
    war, he was the chief cantor of the grand Jewish
    community of Lemberg (Levuv), in Poland.
    When he conducted services there, his voice
    was as powerful as a lion’s roar: it shook the
    very pillars of the synagogue and penetrated the
    heart of every worshiper. From all over Europe
    Jews came to listen to his heart-stirring prayers.
    Then the Nazis came. The chazzan was sent to
    Auschwitz, where he endured unspeakable
    torture. He became blind. He survived the death
    camp, but has lost his vision, his voice and his
    diction.
    “We always beg him to pray for us,” the man
    continues the story, “but he always refuses.
    “Today he agreed.”
    Shlomeleh wanted to bury himself from inner
    shame. “Overwhelmed by my sense of guilt and
    shame, I waited for the old chazzan to approach.
    When he did, holding the Torah scroll, I kissed
    his saintly hands…
    “He asked, who just kissed my hands. They
    told him: Shlomeleh Carlebach. He said:
    Shlomo, I love your niggunim (melodies.) He
    gave me back my soul.”
    On the Subway
    In his “Seven Habits” Steven Covey tells the
    story of him traveling one Sunday morning on a
    subway in New York.
    People were sitting quietly—some reading
    newspapers, some lost in thought, some resting
    with their eyes closed. It was a calm, peaceful
    scene.
    Then, suddenly, a man and his children entered
    the subway car. The children were so loud and
    rambunctious that instantly the whole climate
    changed. The man sat down next to me and
    closed his eyes, apparently oblivious to the
    situation. The children were yelling back and
    forth, throwing things, even grabbing people’s
    papers. It was very disturbing. And yet, the man
    sitting next to me did nothing.
    It was difficult not to feel irritated. I could not
    believe that he could be so insensitive as to let
    his children run wild like that and do nothing
    about it, taking no responsibility at all. (It was
    easy to see that everyone on the subway felt

    irritated, too.) So, finally, with what I felt was
    unusual patience and restraint, I turned to him
    and said, “Sir, your children are really disturbing
    a lot of people. I wonder if you couldn’t control
    them a little more?”
    The man lifted his gaze as if to come to
    consciousness of the situation for the first time
    and said softly, “Oh, you’re right. I guess I
    should do something about it. We just came
    from the hospital where their mother died about
    an hour ago. I don’t know what to think, and I
    guess they don’t know how to handle it either…”
    “Can you imagine what I felt at that moment?”
    Covey concludes his story.
    This is the truth of life: We know nothing of
    the trials, sorrows and temptations of those

    around us, of pillows wet with sobs, of the life-
    tragedy that may be hidden behind a smile, of

    the secret cares, struggles, and worries that
    shorten life and leave their mark in hair
    prematurely whitened, and a character changed
    and almost recreated in a few days. Let us not
    dare to add to the burden of another the pain of
    our judgment, the Torah is telling us. Think
    before you speak. You never know the “whole
    story” of that other person’s life.
    Penniless Employer?
    The Talmud relates this story:
    Once a man went from the Upper Galilee (in
    northern Israel) to work for an employer in the
    south for three years.
    On the eve of Yom Kippur of the third year, he
    said to his employer, “Give me my wages, and I
    will go home and support my wife and my
    children.”
    The employer said to him, “I do not have any
    money to pay you.”
    “Give me fruit instead,” said the worker.
    “I have no fruit,” answered the employer.
    “Give me land,” said the worker.
    “I do not have any land,” answered the
    employer.
    “Give me animals,” said the worker.
    “I do not have any animals,” answered the
    employer.
    “Give me quilts and pillows,” said the worker.
    “I do not have any quilts and pillows,”
    answered the employer.
    The worker packed his bags and went home,
    disappointed.
    After the holiday, the employer traveled to the
    worker’s home with the man’s wages and with
    three donkeys. One was laden with food, the
    second with drinks, and the third with delicacies.
    When he arrived, after they had eaten and
    drunk together, the employer gave the worker
    his wages and all the other gifts, and said to him,
    “When you asked me for your wages, and I told
    you that I did not have any money, did you think
    that was the truth?”
    “I thought,” answered the worker, “that you
    had obtained merchandise at a bargain price,
    and had spent all your money.”
    The employer said to him, “When you asked
    me for animals, and I told you that I did not have
    any animals, what did you think was the truth?”
    “I thought,” answered the worker, “that they
    were rented out to others.”
    The employer said to him, “When you asked
    me for land, and I told you that I did not have
    any land, what did you think was the truth?”
    “I thought, “answered the worker, “that the

    land also was rented out to others.”
    The employer said to him, “When you asked
    me for fruit, and I told you that I did not have
    any fruit, what did you think was the truth?”
    “I thought,” answered the worker, “that the
    fruit had not yet been tithed.”
    The employer said to him, “And after you
    asked me for quilts and Pillows, and I told you
    that I did not have any, what did you think was
    the truth?”
    “I thought,” answered the worker, “that you
    had given away all Your Possessions to the Beis
    Hamikdash by making a vow of hekdesh.”
    The employer said, “I swear to you that that is
    exactly what happened. I had promised away all
    of my possessions to the Beis Hamikdash
    because of Hurkanos, my son, who did not wish
    to learn Torah [and I did not want him to be my
    heir]. And when I came to my friends in the
    south, they annulled my vows.
    “Just as You Judged me favorably, so may G-d
    judge you favorably.”
    In Summation
    So this, in summation, is the conventional
    understanding of this Torah injunction to “judge
    every human being meritoriously.” It consists of
    three points:
    A) If you hear your fellow say something or
    you see him do something, and you can interpret
    it as a being moral or immoral, give him or her
    the benefit of the doubt. As in the Talmudic story
    above, where the employee did not immediately
    assume that his employer was lying. Or as in the
    stories of Shlomo Carlebach and Steven Covey
    where their perceptions clouded the true story.
    B) Even if you know for sure that the person
    did or said something wrong, attribute to him
    positive motives. He may think he is doing the
    right thing.
    C) Even if he knows he is doing the wrong
    thing, be careful before judging him. “Do not
    judge your fellow until you are in his place,”
    warns another of the Pirkei Avot sayings, and
    his place is one place where you will never be.
    You have no way of truly appreciating the
    manner in which his inborn nature, his
    background and/or the circumstances that hold
    sway over his life have influenced his character
    and behavior. His struggles are not mine.
    Perhaps if I would have the same struggles, I
    would behave just as bad, or worse. Yes, you
    may be an addict and I am not. But if I would
    have had the same sensitivities as you, if I would
    have endured the same abuse as you, am I so
    sure I would have not sold my soul to addiction?
    This message, too, is implied in the words of
    our chachamim in Pirkei Avot chapter 1: “Hevei
    dan et kol ha’adam lechaf zechut” – judge every
    person favorably. The word kol ha’adam (every
    person) can be translated as “the whole
    person.” Before you judge someone, you first
    have to know “the whole person”—everything
    about this person, from their background, to the
    workings of their inner psyche, to the challenges
    they are facing today.
    Learn to live this way and you will live a
    happier life, besides being far more effective.