Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    WHAT CAN BE, UNBURDENED BY WHAT HAS BEEN; INTRODUCTION TO PIRKEI AVOT

    Some congregations
    have a custom to
    learn Pirkei Avot
    during the summer
    days, and therefore
    we would like to share
    a thought on the structure of these mishnayot.
    The first mishna starts by stating that Moshe
    received the Torah from Mount Sinai and
    handed it over to Yehoshua. Yehoshua then
    handed it to the sages of his generation, and so
    on. Rabbi Ovadia of Bartenura wrote that the
    mishna means to tell us that, unlike the scholars
    of other nations who wrote man-made ethics
    which they themselves came up with, our
    ethics are all from Hashem, who told
    everything to Moshe Rabbeinu at Mount Sinai.
    Therefore, all of Pirkei Avot are the words of
    the creator, who conveyed them to Moshe.
    But if so, a question should be asked: if all the
    lessons and ethics in those mishnayot are given
    to Moshe, wouldn’t it be more correct, instead
    of attributing the mishnayot to the sages, to
    attribute them all to Moshe, meaning that after
    saying “Moshe received the Torah from Sinai,”
    it could continue with “and Moshe said,” and
    then write the whole Pirkei Avot.
    I think the answer is that although all the
    mishnayot were handed down from Moshe, the

    reason each mishna is attributed to a different
    sage is because that sage used to say it over
    and over again to his generation. The
    commentators explain that the mishnayot they
    would say were constantly part of their
    messages to their students. But why would
    they repeat these teachings over and over
    again. It seems the reason was that the lessons
    they emphasized were the ones that their
    generation was lacking, and therefore they
    needed to constantly emphasize them to ensure
    the people of their generation would improve
    their way of thinking and acting.
    If so, let’s try to think about what those sages
    would emphasize in our generation if they
    were living with us today. I would think that it
    might have been the first mishna, which tells
    us that we should not ignore our past, which is
    deeply rooted in conservative ethics. Let’s
    explain:
    Some of the most ridiculed and laughable
    statements repeated in the media are attributed
    to Vice President Kamala Harris. For example,
    she once said, “The significance of the passage
    of time. So, when you think about it, there is
    great significance to the passage of time in
    terms of what we need to do to lay these
    wires,” which left people puzzled by the
    seemingly incoherent “word salad.” Another

    much more known statement she has repeated
    about 2,000 times is, “What can be,
    unburdened by what has been,” or “I can
    imagine what can be, and be unburdened by
    what has been.” These statements made the
    American people wonder why she keeps
    repeating words that no one really understands.
    Her tendency to use such phrases and her
    often criticized laugh have led some to view
    her as unattractive for the highest office.
    However, the question remains: is she really
    unaware of what she’s talking about, or is she
    sending a very concerning message about what
    America and the entire world would look like
    under her leadership?
    It seems like she is trying to promote the
    progressive ideology, which suggests that the
    past conservative values holds no significance
    and should be unburdened by the new ideology
    of the future agenda. The goals of the strange
    and “salad” progressives movement which
    have no order or structure are indeed
    emphasized by her strange “word salad,”
    which fits this narrative.
    This narrative has declared war on all fronts:
    on the basic concept of two genders, where
    one may not address a man as a man or a
    woman as a woman without risking legal
    action. People can choose to identify

    themselves from a large variety of genders or
    even invent new ones. There is also a war on
    the family structure, where one can have
    multiple parents from all the above various
    genders. Additionally, there is a war on the
    basic idea of a nation, with open borders
    idealism in America and Europe challenging
    the concept of a nation as everyone is
    encouraged to blur the notion of borders and
    communities.
    Accordingly, I think that if the Tannaim were
    to live in our time and face our challenges, the
    message that would be chosen from all the
    many mishnayot in Pirkei Avot would be the
    very first one. It tells us that we should return
    to the message of the Creator from the time of
    creation, given to us at Mount Sinai, which
    teaches the basics of life in this very confused
    universe.