Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    A PLANE WITH STRINGS ATTACHED: WHEN A GIFT IS NOT A GIMME

    Heads turned last week
    at the news that
    President Trump is
    planning to accept a
    $400 million luxury
    plane, as a gift from
    the Qatari government,
    to serve as Air Force
    One. The Constitution
    forbids public office holders from accepting a
    present “of any kind whatever, from any King,
    Prince, or foreign State.” The president has
    argued that this gift does not violate that
    provision since it is going to the Department of
    Defense and not to him personally and that,
    moreover, it will be decommissioned after his
    term for his presidential library, and promises
    that he will not use it after leaving office.
    I’m not qualified to weigh in on whether the
    gift is legal or illegal, but I do know that at a
    minimum it is a very bad look and raises
    suspicions about what is expected in exchange
    for the gift.
    When challenged as to the judgement of
    accepting such a large gift from one of the
    world’s greatest sponsors of terror, President
    Trump said, “They’re giving us a free jet. I
    could say, ‘No, no, no, don’t give us, I want to
    pay you a billion, or $400 million,’ or whatever
    it is. Or, I could say, ‘Thank you very much.’”
    To support his judgment and approach, he
    invoked the alleged saying of a golf great.
    “There was an old golfer named Sam Snead.

    Old Sam Snead had a motto. They give you a
    putt, you say, ‘Thank you very much.’ You pick
    up your ball, and you walk to the next hole. A
    lot of people are stupid. They say, ‘No, no, I
    insist on putting it.’ Then they putt it, they miss
    it, and their partner gets angry at them.
    Remember that.”
    The President essentially shared his philosophy
    of accepting gifts. You would be stupid to ever
    turn one down. Treat it like a gimme putt, take
    it and move on no matter who it is from or what
    may be implied is owed in return.
    What should our view be? Should we accept
    all gifts or do the source, intent, and
    circumstance matter? What if the gift could
    potentially influence our judgement or cause us
    to find favor?
    The Torah’s view is very different than
    President Trump’s. In Mishlei (16:27), Shlomo
    HaMelech taught, “Sonei matanos yichye, he
    who despises gifts will live.” The Gemara
    (Sota 47b) reports that when people began to
    accept gifts, they started to live shorter lives.
    Does this mean we should rejects all gifts?
    Should we reject a gift when we host someone
    to sleep in our home or have them for a meal?
    Should we send a gift back if a person we did a
    favor for wants to show their appreciation?
    Should we insist on paying for ourselves at the
    end of each meal, even if we are being treated
    for our birthday, a special occasion or no
    reason at all? Should those celebrating a
    simcha not accept gifts?

    Rashi explains that the inclination to reject
    gifts conditions you to avoid what isn’t yours
    and therefore protects one from being tempted
    to steal. Rabbeinu Yonah explains that rejecting
    gifts will help a person avoid desiring that
    which isn’t theirs and protects one from being
    influenced by flattery. Rabbeinu Bechayei
    gives an altogether different reason. He says
    that if someone has true faith in Hashem, they
    rely only and exclusively on Him and have no
    interest in gifts or handouts from others.
    The Rambam (Hilchos Zechiya U’matana
    12:17) and Shulchan Aruch (CM 249) codify
    that it is a midas chasidus, a righteous practice
    not to receive gifts, and to trust that Hashem
    will provide what we need without relying on
    fellow man.
    However, the Chida (Teshuvos Chaim Sha’al
    1:74:42) writes that today, not receiving gifts is
    a noble practice for those who want to
    volunteer, but the masses do accept gifts and it
    is not considered a breach in faith in Hashem.
    Rav Wosner and Rav Shternbuch both say that
    receiving a gift for a wedding is not only
    permissible, it is a mitzvah, as there is an
    obligation to bring simcha to the bride and
    groom.
    The reality is that not all gifts are the same.
    They come in different sizes and values, they
    come from different sources, they are given for
    different reasons, and they may or may not
    come with strings attached. These variables
    could determine the merit or ethic or

    appropriateness of accepting a gift.
    Perhaps that is why Avraham graciously
    accepted gifts from Pharaoh and Avimelech,
    yet he told the King of Sedom that he wouldn’t
    so much as accept a shoelace from him.
    Additionally, Avraham refused to accept
    Ma’aras HaMachpeila as a gift from Efron and
    insisted on overpaying for it. Each context
    must be judged individually.
    Rejecting a gift from a guest or someone
    simply trying to show appreciation, or turning
    down a gift given for an occasion in your life,
    is ungracious and can hurt the feelings of the
    other. One isn’t compromised by accepting it,
    and assuming it isn’t large enough to impact
    one’s need to earn a living and depend on
    Hashem, it doesn’t pose a threat to one’s faith.
    Accepting gifts when they could compromise
    judgement or constitute a bribe, however,
    taking something so significant it can alter a
    lifestyle or sense of dependance on Hashem,
    can be problematic. In benching, we ask of
    Hashem, lo liydei matnas basar v’dam, may we
    never get to a point of needing to rely on the
    gifts and handouts of other people. May we
    have the wisdom and insight to know which
    gifts to graciously accept and which to
    principally turn down. When to pick up the
    ball and move to the next hole, and when to
    insist we putt it ourselves.