Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    A WOMAN AS SHUL PRESIDENT

    And Miriam the
    prophetess, the sister
    of Aharon, took the
    drum in her hand,
    and all of the women
    followed her with
    drums and dances.

    Shemos 15:20
    Introduction
    A number of Orthodox Shuls have either
    suggested appointing or actually have
    appointed women to serve as their presidents
    or on their board of directors. Assuming that
    the community is one in which women are
    generally taking leading roles in communal
    activities, is there any halachic objection to
    women serving in these roles? To the extent
    that there are halachic sensitivities, is it an
    absolute prohibition, or is it something that
    allows for some degree of leeway depending
    on the community?
    The Source
    The main objection to having a woman serve
    in a position of authority comes from a
    comment in the Rambam (Hilchos Melachim
    1:5). The Torah instructs (Devarim 17:15),
    “Som tasim alecha melech,” “You shall
    appoint a king over you,” and the Sifri

    (Shoftim 157) derives from this that we
    specifically appoint a king and not a queen.
    The Rambam elaborates that this applies not
    only to actual royal appointments, but to any
    position that requires an official appointment
    and constitutes authority over others (serarah).
    This would likely preclude a woman from
    serving as a shul president, since it is an
    appointment that carries a certain level of
    authority.
    Rav Moshe’s Explanation
    Rav Moshe Feinstein (Igros Moshe, YD
    2:44,45) suggests that the Rambam is based
    on a Gemara in Yevamos (45b), which rules,
    based on the same pasuk, that a ger is not
    permitted to be appointed as a king, nor may
    he be given any position of authority. Thus,
    the Rambam is simply applying the Gemara’s
    reasoning to the Sifri. When one is excluded
    from the right to be appointed as a king, he is
    similarly excluded from all positions of
    authority.
    Defining Serarah
    In order to know what the Rambam would
    prohibit, it is essential to understand what
    constitutes a position of serarah. The Gemara
    in Kiddushin (76b) teaches that a ger should
    not be given the job of inspecting vendors’

    weights and measures. Rav Moshe (YD 4:26)
    explains that although this is certainly not a
    prestigious position, it is one that allows the
    individual to oversee and work against what
    others in his field – even those who hired him
    – are trying to accomplish. In this case, the
    local vendors might be attempting to cheat
    with their weights and measures, and it is the
    inspector’s job to keep their dishonest
    proclivities in check. In contrast, a CEO of a
    company, who is obviously in a more
    prestigious and authoritative position, is not
    there to work against anyone in the company,
    but to more generally manage and make
    important decisions for the company.
    Based on this definition, Rav Moshe rules that
    a ger can serve as a rosh yeshiva or a
    mashgiach in a yeshiva, even though he has
    the authority to throw students out of the
    school. This is because a rosh yeshiva works
    for the yeshiva’s board of directors and is
    supposed to implement their demands, not to
    work against them. Thus, we find that in a
    wide range of religious communities, women
    serve as principals and heads of school.
    On the other hand, a mashgiach of kashrus is
    considered to hold a position of serarah, since
    he is hired to supervise and keep the business
    owner in check, sometimes working against
    the owner’s business interests in the name of
    kashrus. Based on this, Rav Moshe ruled
    that a woman cannot serve as the chief
    mashgiach of a factory or facility. He did,
    however, permit a woman to work for a rav
    hamachshir and serve to implement his
    policies.
    Other Opinions in the Rishonim
    Many other rishonim seem to dispute the
    Rambam’s application of serarah and do
    permit a woman to serve in various public
    appointments.
    Tosafos (Niddah 50a, s.v. kol), in discussing
    the role that Devorah played as a shofetes,
    cites an opinion that a woman is permitted
    to serve as a dayan, which is certainly a
    position of serarah.
    The Sefer HaChinuch (497), in describing
    the mitzvah of appointing a king, mentions
    that a woman cannot be appointed to this
    position, while in the next mitzvah, he
    writes that a ger cannot be appointed to a
    position of serarah and makes no mention of
    women in this regard. This indicates that the
    Chinuch also argues with the Rambam.
    Rav Moshe points out that Rashi (Kiddushin
    76b) and the Ran (Kiddushin 31a in dapei
    HaRif) understand that the source of the
    issur of serarah for a ger is the words “som
    tasim,” whereas the Rambam’s source
    prohibiting a woman from serarah is the
    word “melech” (velo malkah), thus
    indicating that they are not necessarily
    related. Rav Moshe adds that the Ramban
    and Rashba likely disagree with the
    Rambam as well, since they do not deal with

    the issue of Devorah serving as a judge,
    indicating that they likely have no problem
    with it.
    However, the Ritva (Shevuos 30a, s.v.
    shevuas) does agree with the Rambam that a
    woman cannot be appointed as a dayan.
    Based on the fact that this is a machlokes
    rishonim and it is an issue of an issur d’oraysa,
    Rav Moshe rules that we should be machmir
    for the opinion of the Rambam and refrain
    from appointing women to positions of
    serarah.
    A Shul President
    Do we consider a shul president to be a
    position of serarah? According to Rav Moshe’s
    definition, the answer would be yes. The
    president and board members of a shul are
    there to ensure that the rabbi and the members
    of the shul are following their mandates
    appropriately, and they have to make
    supervisory decisions that may be in conflict
    with the desires and tendencies of others in the
    shul. Rav Moshe therefore rules that a woman
    may not serve as president or a board member
    of a shul.
    Other poskim, including Rav Soloveitchik,
    permit women to serve on the shul board, but
    not as president of the shul, as they view the
    president as being the singular person of
    authority, while other board members serve
    merely as his deputies and do not have the
    power to make any decisions on their own.
    Rav Soloveitchik thought it wisest for women
    not to serve as vice president either, since the
    title would suggest that they are eligible to
    become president. Rav Chaim Dovid HaLevi
    (Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv from 1973-1998)
    writes in a teshuvah that even according to the
    Rambam, a woman should be able to serve as
    president of a shul, since (in his opinion)
    serarah applies only to a position that is given
    through appointment or taken forcefully, not
    to a position that is voted on by the public or
    by the membership.
    Other Considerations
    It is important to note that a shul president
    spends many hours working very closely with
    the rabbi of the shul, and it is extremely
    inadvisable for a man and a woman who are
    not married to each other to spend so much
    time together. While sometimes unavoidable
    in a business context, it is wisest to avoid this
    unwanted challenge in a Jewish communal
    leadership context. This is true even if the
    halachos of yichud are strictly adhered to and
    everything is