Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    AMALEK AND THE GAZA WAR

    I. Amalek Today
    With the October 7th
    Hamas attacks and the
    subsequent war, many
    have discussed the
    concept of the timeless
    war against Amalek.
    Amalek is the paradigm
    of the enemy of the Jewish people, a nation
    that attacked us without provocation in
    the desert. The nation epitomizes the
    seemingly endless persecution — the
    pogroms and assaults — we have suffered
    throughout the ages and continue to suffer,
    and the defiance of the divine protection
    which was just evident in the Exodus. In
    this war that spans the generations, we are
    commanded to kill every Amalekite —
    man and woman, child and adult (1 Shmuel
    15:3). Does this apply today?
    Granted, we are required to offer
    Amalekites peace before attacking them
    (Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Melachim 6:1,6)
    and if they want to become Bnei Noach
    (Kessef Mishneh, Hilchos Melachim
    6:4) or even convert to Judaism they can
    (Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Issurei Bi’ah
    12:17, according to Chida, Pesach Einayim,
    Sanhedrin 96b). However, otherwise we
    are commanded to attack them. Does this
    apply in our times?

    On the one hand, we cannot identify
    anyone as a descendant of Amalek with
    any amount of certainty. On the other
    hand, Rav Joseph B. Soloveitchik quoted
    his father, Rav Moshe Soloveichik, as
    saying that any nation that acts like
    Amalek and attempts to destroy the entire
    Jewish nation gains the status of Amalek.
    With this, he explains why the Rambam
    rules that the commandment to destroy
    the seven Canaanite nations no longer
    applies because Sancheriv dispersed the
    nations but fails to rule similarly regarding
    the commandment to destroy Amalek
    (Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Melachim 5:4-5).
    Wasn’t Amalek dispersed, as well? If so,
    why does that command still apply? Rav
    Soloveitchik explains that the command
    applies to any nation that acts like
    Amalek. However, even if true, it does not
    necessarily follow that there is any mitzvah
    in attacking our contemporary antagonists

    other than the important mitzvah of self-
    defense.

    II. Shaul’s Failure
    First, most Rishonim believe, based on a
    Gemara (Sanhedrin 20b), that the mitzvah
    to destroy Amalek only applies in the times
    of Mashiach. We must appoint a king and
    then he leads the war against Amalek (e.g.
    Hagahos Maimoniyos, Hilchos Melachim

    5:1). However, I would like
    to explore an approach that
    understands the mitzvah
    differently. In 1 Shmuel
    15, the prophet Shmuel
    relays the divine command
    to King Shaul to kill the
    Amalekites living in Israel.
    Shaul allows King Agag
    (and the sheep) to live,
    for which he is rebuked
    by Shmuel and because
    of which the kingship
    was removed from Shaul.
    Shmuel tells Shaul that he
    “did wrong in the eyes of
    G-d.” What specific act of Shaul’s was
    considered wrong? If anything, his sin was
    failing to act by refraining from completely
    destroying Amalek.
    In the Chafetz Chaim Al HaTorah (Parashas
    Zachor, after Terumah), this question is
    answered in the name of the Chafetz Chaim
    as follows: The command is to completely
    destroy Amalek. If you kill some members
    of the nation but not everyone, you have
    not fulfilled the mitzvah. The mitzvah
    is to follow the divine command in this
    exceptional circumstance, to do what is
    otherwise forbidden in the strongest terms.
    Rather than following a divine command,
    you have committed murder. Killing is
    justified in rare circumstances, such as
    self-defense, war, and judicial execution.
    Destroying Amalek is a justified war only
    in completion; otherwise, it is unjustified
    and “wrong in G-d’s eyes.”
    If so, this cannot be accomplished today.
    Even if we could identify Amalekites, we
    as individuals cannot wage war against
    them all nor can an army realistically
    destroy every person today who is intent
    on destroying the Jewish people. There
    are too many people spread across the
    world. A failed attempt to completely
    destroy Amalek is sinful. So the answer
    to this question would be no.
    Rav Shmuel Greiniman, the editor of
    Chafetz Chaim Al HaTorah, attributes this
    explanation to the Chafetz Chaim based
    on the report of someone he considers
    reliable. However, Rav Gershon Zaks,
    the Chafetz Chaim’s grandson, explores
    his grandfather’s view of this mitzvah
    based on published sources written
    by the Chafetz Chaim himself and
    reaches a different conclusion (Mo’adei
    HaGershuni, no. 54). Perhaps the Chafetz
    Chaim offered different approaches at
    different times. Regardless, Rav Moshe
    Sternbuch (Mo’adim Uzemanim, vol.
    2 no. 162) independently develops this
    approach.

    III. Life After Shaul
    Rav Sternbuch asks why no later biblical
    kings, after Shaul, were commanded to
    destroy Amalek. Some were very righteous
    and aggressive in enhancing religious
    standards. Why didn’t they fulfill this
    biblical commandment? And why weren’t
    they punished like Shaul for failing to
    do so? Rav Sternbuch explains that after
    Shaul’s failed attempt, the remaining
    Amalekites dispersed and assimilated into
    other nations. After Shaul, it is impossible
    to fulfill this mitzvah until Mashiach comes
    and clarifies, ending this war that lasts
    through the generations (Shemos 17:16).
    As mentioned above, Hagahos
    Maimoniyos (Hilchos Melachim 5:1)
    quotes the Semag as saying that this mitzvah
    only applies in the times of Mashiach.
    Radbaz (Hilchos Melachim 5:5) asks a
    brief but powerful question on this view. If
    this mitzvah is reserved for Mashiach, why
    was Shaul asked to do it and punished for
    failing to do so? Rav Sternbuch responds
    that Shaul was the last person capable of
    waging this war because Amalek was still
    identifiable in his time. After Shaul’s failed
    attempt, Amalek dispersed and even if
    individual Amalekites are identifiable, the
    mitzvah cannot be performed unless all
    can be found, which is impossible. Even
    according to Rav Soloveitchik, there are
    too many genocidal Amalekites, too many
    would-be terrorists, around the world to
    make this feasible even theoretically.
    According to this approach, even those
    Amalekites who refuse to make peace with
    us and choose not to become Bnei Noach
    or Jews are not subject to this ancient war.
    And those of us alive today are not expected
    to engage in this war. When Mashiach
    comes, this will all be figured out. I pray
    that the Amalekites of today will recognize

    the divine hand in history and become G-d-
    fearing Bnei Noach as the rest of the world

    becomes filled with knowledge of G-d (Isa.
    11:9).