Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    ASHKENAZIM VS. SEPHARDIM.

    Coming off the exalted
    Yom Tov of Shavuot,
    which commemorates
    the special day of
    receiving the holy
    Torah in Mt. Sinai
    from Hashem;
    one might come to ponder how the Torah
    branched off from one single unifying text
    to rulings so different as seen between
    Ashkenazim and Sephardim.
    After our nation was exiled from its land,
    we were scattered to different places in
    the world. Some were exiled to Europe
    while others to Spain and the countries in
    the Middle East. The distance between the
    places had a great impact on their culture,
    language, genetics, food, and nuances of
    prayer.
    For the last 1,000 years the Jewish people
    have, for the most part, been divided into
    two main groups: Ashkenazi and Sephardi.
    Contemporary Ashkenazim are European
    Jews and descendants of Yiddish-speaking
    Jews. Sephardim originate in the Iberian
    Peninsula and the Arabic lands. Although
    in this generation, those differences

    are rapidly fading as Ashkenazim and
    Sephardim mostly live together and their
    children go to the same schools. Many even
    marry each other, having children that are
    Sephardi from one side and Ashkenazi from
    the other.
    One of the differences between the two
    groups which is still very relevant today is
    the way each follows their halacha.
    Many of those differences developed due to
    the Psakim of the Rabbis which they follow,
    mostly the Shulchan Aruch and the Rema
    (though there are many more differences
    as well, but that is beyond the scope of this
    article). The Sephardim follow the rulings
    of Rabbi Yosef Karo in the Shulchan Aruch,
    and Ashkenazim follow Rabbi Moshe
    Isserlish in the Rema.
    Let’s first try to understand how each of
    those two giants arrived at their respective
    psakim.
    When one learns Gemara, he would usually
    begin learning the words of the text with
    the interpretation of Rashi, as it is almost
    impossible to understand the Gemara
    without the guidance of Rashi. After

    learning the words of Rashi, one
    usually continues with learning
    the Tosfot and other Rishonim
    like the Rosh, Rif, Rambam,
    Rashba, Ramban and others.
    The question one needs to ask is
    whether those Rishonim wrote
    their rulings L’ehalacha or did
    they just write an interpretation
    to the Gmara but didn’t mean
    that it should be the way one
    should rule as Halacha Le’maase.
    אגרות משה אה״ע ח״ד) Feinstein Moshe Rav
    א אות פג סימן (‘says that the Shulchan Aruch
    and the Rema argued over those points,
    as the Shulchan Aruch understood that
    most of the Rishonim didn’t write a clear
    Halacha since their main objective was to
    interpret the Gemara by asking questions
    on the Gemara’s difficulties and answering
    them, with the exception of three Rishonim,
    whose main objective was to give a
    clear, definitive ruling on each topic: the
    Rambam, the Rif and the Rosh. Therefore,
    the Shulchan Aruch ruled according to those
    three Rishonim over others. The Rema, on
    the other hand, felt that although all other
    Rishonim wrote many questions and
    answers to reconcile the difficulties of
    the Gemara, but those were not done
    without a Halachic purpose; rather those
    answers were geared towards Halacha,
    and therefore they can be counted that
    way as well:
    Still this answer is not complete, as the
    Rema himself said in his introduction
    that he wrote his essay because he
    disagreed on Rabbi Karo, who ignored
    the principle that whenever latter
    commentaries conclude differently than
    the earlier commentaries, we follow the
    latter ones. The reason being that since
    the latter Poskim saw what the earlier
    Poskim wrote and still decided to rule
    differently than them, we therefore must
    assume that they took that knowledge
    into account and still decided that the
    Halacha should be different.
    The Rema argued that Rabbi Karo didn’t
    follow that principle, therefore he saw
    that he must write his ruling accordingly.
    As we see, the Shulchan Aruch restricted
    his ruling to only three poskim, while
    the Rema on the other hand saw more
    widely to include all Poskim as well.
    This system seemed to change later in
    history, as the Psak of the later Sephardi
    Poskim differ from their Ashkenazi
    contemporaries on this very point.
    The Ben Ish Chai writes that the

    Ashkenazi Poskim way is to look only at
    what the earlier Poskim, the Rishonim, wrote
    without opening the works of contemporary
    Poskim, implying that the Sephardi Poskim
    did search in many contemporary books to
    see if they can find something which they
    didn’t think of in order to apply it to their
    ruling:
    Another very basic difference in the Psak is
    based on the Machloket between Pshat and
    Kabbala.
    The Bet Yosef wrote (קמא סימן (that the
    Zohar overrides the ruling of the Poskim:
    on the contrary, the Rema argued that we
    follow the Poskim over the Zohar: The Bet
    Yosef explained (כה‘ סי או״ח (that in reality
    any Posek who says differently than the
    Zohar, is only doing so because he didn’t
    see the Zohar’s opinion, but if they would
    have seen the Zohar, surely, they would
    change their mind and rule in accordance
    with the Zohar. The reason the Poskim
    didn’t see what the Zohar says is because
    the Zohar was hidden for about 1500 years
    since Rabbi Abba wrote all those wonderful
    secrets that were given to him by Rabbi
    Shimon Bar Yochai.
    Later poskim followed this principle as
    (סימן כח, ס״ָק מב) Berura Mishna The .well
    who is the main Posek of the previous
    generation for the Ashkenazim, wrote to
    follow the Gemara and the Poskim over
    the Zohar and Kabbala, with exception
    to whenever the Poskim didn’t state their
    opinion or whenever the Poskim argue
    over a certain law, then the Zohar would
    determine the outcome. Another exception
    is if the Kabbala is more stringent than the
    Pshat then we should follow the Kabbala.
    Contrary to that, the Kaf Hachayim a late
    that) סימן כה, ס״ק עה) wrote ,Posek Sefaradi
    the Sefaradi approach is the way the Bet
    Yosef stated (see above), that Le’halacha
    we go with the Zohar’s ruling. Since the
    Sephardim always follow the Shulchan
    Aruch, in this very case it isn’t any
    different, and one must follow his Psak that
    Kabbala overrides the Pshat and all other
    Poskim. Moreover, even if the Bet Yosef
    himself says differently than the Kabbala,
    Sephardim must follow the Kabbala.