Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    BALAK – VALUES BEFORE RESOURCES

    If only I had more…
    It is troubling to think
    that Hashem could
    have ever conferred
    His presence on
    Bilam, who, as the narrative makes clear,
    was of deplorable character. His greed,
    stubbornness, and negativity are all
    overwhelmingly featured as he deceives
    Balak and tries to outwit Hashem. Why did
    Hashem select such a reprehensible person to
    be a navi?
    Rashi (Bamidbar 22:5) explains that Hashem
    was concerned with a potential complaint
    from the nations of the world. At the
    end of days, when taken to task for their
    immoral behavior and corrupt societies, the
    nations could claim that they never had an
    opportunity for self-improvement. Had they
    been provided with a prophet who could
    connect them with Hashem, perhaps they
    would have become great people.
    In order to preempt this defense, Hashem
    did, indeed, provide them with a navi:
    Bilam. However, instead of self-reflection
    and repentance, the nations misused Bilam’s

    abilities to further their sinful behavior. They
    sought his services to become wealthier,
    undermine their enemies, and fulfill their
    desires. In doing so, they forfeited any future
    excuse.
    Yet a difficulty remains. Did Hashem truly
    give the nations a fair opportunity? Of all
    people, He chose Bilam – the man whom
    Chazal describe as the embodiment of
    jealousy, arrogance, and self-indulgence
    (Avos 5:19). How could such a person inspire
    others toward spiritual growth?
    Rav Moshe Shternbuch shlita offers a
    fascinating answer in Ta’am VaDa’as. If
    Hashem selected Bilam to serve as the
    nations’ opportunity for self-improvement,
    then Bilam must initially have been worthy
    of that role. At the time he was chosen, he
    possessed the potential to guide people
    toward Hashem. However, the nations
    themselves corrupted that opportunity.
    Rather than seeking inspiration and moral
    refinement, they viewed their prophet as
    another resource to be exploited for their
    own interests. They wanted blessings, power,
    wealth, and gratification – not growth.

    After years of being used in this manner,
    Bilam himself deteriorated into the jealous,
    arrogant, and self-indulgent figure we
    encounter in our parashah.
    The lesson is profound. We often imagine
    that our shortcomings are primarily a matter
    of resources. If only we had more money,
    more time, more knowledge, or more
    opportunities, we would become the people
    we aspire to be.
    The story of Bilam suggests otherwise.
    Resources do not determine our priorities;
    they reveal them. The nations were given
    access to prophecy, yet instead of using that
    gift to pursue truth and spiritual growth,
    they used it to advance the very values they
    already held. The problem was never a lack of
    opportunity. It was a lack of direction.
    The same is often true in our own lives.
    More money does not automatically make
    a person generous. More free time does
    not automatically make a person devoted
    to family or Torah. More talent does not
    automatically make a person greater. More
    often than not, additional resources simply
    enable us to do more of what we were already

    inclined to do.
    That is why the first step in growth is not
    acquiring more resources, but clarifying our
    priorities. When a person genuinely values
    Torah, chessed, and avodas Hashem, even
    limited resources can be used meaningfully.
    And when greater opportunities eventually
    arrive, they become powerful tools for
    further growth.
    Bilam’s tragedy was not that he lacked
    opportunity; few people in history possessed
    greater spiritual gifts. His tragedy was that
    those gifts became tools of distorted values.
    Our task is to ensure that our values shape
    the way we use our resources, rather than
    allowing our resources to shape our values.