Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    BRINGING A GUN INTO A SHUL

    Laws about gun
    control serve as
    perpetual fuel for
    political debates.
    However, everyone
    agrees that some
    people should carry
    guns in some circumstances. Whether
    police officers or soldiers, on duty or
    prepared for duty, some people need to
    carry guns in order to protect the public.
    In Messianic times, weapons will be
    turned into ploughshares (Isa. 2:4). Until
    then, weapons serve a necessary purpose
    in this unredeemed world.
    Anyone who owns a gun needs gun
    training and must understand proper
    safety and usage in order to avoid tragedy.
    These issues are crucial but not our topic.
    Here I am interested in exploring other
    aspects of gun ownership.
    I. A Weapon in Shul
    Rav Meir (Maharam) of Rothenburg
    (13th cen., Germany) is quoted as saying
    that you may not bring a long sword

    into a shul because it contradicts the
    purpose of prayer–prayer increases a
    person’s life (Berachos 8a, 54b) while a
    weapons shortens life (Orechos Chaim,
    Hilchos Beis Ha-Knesses 7; Kol Bo
    17; Tashbetz 202). Similar ideas can be
    found in a number of rabbinic passages.
    The Gemara (Sanhedrin 82a) says that
    you may not enter a beis midrash, study
    hall, with a weapon. The Mechilta (Ex.
    20:22) explains the prohibition against
    using tools to fashion the stones of the
    altar that the altar is intended to extended
    people’s lives while iron shortens lives.
    However, numerous rabbinic passages
    mention a sword in a beis midrash. For
    one day in history, Hilel and Shammai,
    together with their colleagues and
    students, debated their disagreements
    until reaching a conclusion. They
    stuck a sword in the beis midrash and
    said anyone can enter but no one can
    leave. Clearly, they allowed a sword in
    the beis midrash (Shabbos 17a). The
    Gemara (Sanhedrin 94b) describes how
    Chizkiyahu the king defeated Sancheriv.

    He realized that Torah study weakened
    the enemy so Chizkiyahu stuck a sword
    at the entrance of the beis midrash and
    said, “Anyone who does not engage in
    Torah study shall be stabbed.”
    Rav Reuven Margoliyos (20th cen.,
    Israel; Margoliyos Ha-Yam 82a:34)
    suggests that a sword was brought to
    outside the entrance but not inside. This
    seems a bit forced. However, all these
    passages refer to a beis midrash and not
    a shul.
    II. Concealed Weapon
    Rabbeinu Peretz (13th cen., France)
    adds a gloss to Maharam’s comment
    that the only concern is when the
    weapon is uncovered. This can be
    interpreted in two ways. One possibility
    is that Rabbeinu Peretz was qualifying
    Maharam’s statement, saying that only
    an uncovered knife is forbidden (Eliyah
    Rabbah 251:10). Alternatively, Rabbeinu
    Peretz disagrees with Maharam and
    permits someone to enter a shul with a
    long sword but forbids someone whose
    head is uncovered to enter (Birkei
    Yosef 251:9).
    Rav David Ha-Levi Segal (17th cen.,
    Poland; Taz, Orach Chaim 151:2)
    compares this rule to a similar rule
    requiring covering any knives on the
    table while bentching, reciting grace
    after meals, except on Shabbos and
    holidays (Shulchan Aruch, Orach
    Chaim 180:5, from Orechos Chaim,
    Hilchos Birkas Ha-Mazon 8). The
    Taz asks why we have the option to
    cover a knife for bentching but not
    for prayer. He answers that covering
    works for both. However, at the
    table, we have small knives that we
    can easily cover. For prayer, we are
    discussing long swords that are hard
    to cover. However, if we can cover the
    long sword, then everyone agrees you
    can bring it into a shul.
    Mishnah Berurah (20th cen,. Poland;
    151:22) and Aruch Ha-Shulchan
    (19th cen., Russia; 151:11) agree that
    covering is sufficient to allow bringing
    a gun into a shul. Rav Ovadiah Yosef
    (21st cen., Israel; Yechaveh Da’as
    5:28) adds that if you cannot cover the
    gun or put it in a safe place, you may
    rely on the lenient opinion and bring
    the gun uncovered into a shul.

    III. Guidelines
    Rav Eliezer Waldenberg (20th cen.,
    Israel; Tzitz Eliezer 10:18:6) adds another
    factor. A gun without bullets is relatively
    harmless. While you can use it to hit
    someone hard, you can do the same with
    a book or a pen. Effectively, removing
    the bullets from the gun disables it as
    a weapon, thereby permitting you to
    bring it into a shul. (He does not say that
    turning the safety on disables it.)
    Therefore, he provides the following
    order of behavior:
    1. In a time of danger or military
    preparedness, carry your gun with you
    according to your orders.
    2. Otherwise, if it is no extra bother,
    remove your guns before entering a shul
    and give them to someone to watch.
    3. If that is not possible, remove the
    bullets from the guns (you can still keep
    the bullets in your pocket, just not in the
    weapon). If possible, cover the guns also.
    4. If you cannot remove the bullets,
    keep your pistol in its holster and cover
    any large gun with something like a
    jacket or tallis.
    Again, safety has to come first. This
    rule should never place anyone’s life in
    danger. Be smart and safe.