Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    ELUL; I AM TO MY BELOVED, AND MY BELOVED IS MINE.

    The month of Elul
    is characterized by
    the pasuk from Shir
    HaShirim: “I am my
    beloved’s, and my
    beloved is mine.”
    But is this verse
    only symbolic
    because its initials spell “Elul,” or is there
    a deeper meaning intended?
    Rabbi Leib Mintzberg (Ben Melech, Shir
    HaShirim, essay four) explained how the
    relationship between us and the Creator is
    expressed in the Torah mainly in three
    forms: servant, son, and spouse, each
    essentially different from the other. Let us
    attempt to clarify each one.
    Master and servant:
    The servant–master relationship is such
    that the master commands, and the
    servant fulfills without emotion and
    without understanding. His entire essence
    is to do what the master has commanded
    and no more. Thus, the Sages described
    the servant as lazy, since all his actions
    are solely for his master’s sake, and he
    gains nothing for himself. In the Gemara
    (Kiddushin 49b) it is said: “Ten measures
    of sleep descended to the world; nine
    were taken by servants, and one by the
    rest of the world.” This is because the
    servant has no pleasure or benefit from
    his work. Moreover, the servant has no
    desire to know why the master
    commanded what he commanded—his
    only wish is to do what is imposed upon
    him and then rest. His overall feeling is
    fear of the master, lest he punish him.
    Therefore, the servant feels no joy when
    his master is pleased, only relief that he
    has not been punished.
    Father and son:
    Unlike the servant, the son desires to
    bring joy to his father. This comes from
    the fact that while the servant’s essence is
    to serve the master, in the father–son
    relationship it is the father who serves the
    son from birth until he matures, and only
    when the son grows independent does he
    have the opportunity to return joy to his
    father. In truth, the father seeks nothing
    from the son; his true satisfaction is in
    seeing his son succeed and follow the
    good path. That is, whereas the servant’s
    deeds serve the master’s benefit, the
    father desires that the son should benefit
    himself, and in that the father rejoices.
    From this, a great love is born between
    father and son, as their souls are bound
    together. The son senses that his father’s

    intention is his good, and therefore he
    seeks to give him joy in whatever way he
    can. Moreover, the son also desires to
    resemble his father, to learn his ways, and
    to understand why his father acts as he
    does and why he commands him in
    certain matters.
    Husband and wife:
    This relationship is fundamentally
    different from the previous two. It is a
    union in which the couple become one, as
    the Sages said: “A man’s wife is as his
    own body,” and as the pasuk states: “Bone
    of my bones, and flesh of my flesh,” and:
    “Therefore a man shall cling to his wife,
    and they shall become one flesh.”
    Ramban explained: “The woman was
    bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh,
    and he clung to her…. and since this was
    the case with Adam, this nature was
    implanted in his offspring—that the men
    among them should cling to their wives,
    leaving father and mother and seeing
    their wives as closer to them than their
    parents.”
    Since they are considered one, when one
    does something for the other, it is not
    truly for the other but for themselves—or
    more precisely, for their unity. This
    relationship is not merely about
    understanding what the other wants, but
    about feeling the other’s desire and
    making it your own. Such a relationship
    is built more on emotion than on intellect,
    unlike the servant who acts because “this
    is what I must do,” or the son who acts
    because “this is the right thing to do.”
    Rather, here in spouses’ relationship it is
    “this is what I want to do.” As the Sages
    said: “Who is a worthy wife? She who
    does her husband’s will.” This does not
    mean she has no will of her own, but
    rather that each spouse acts for the sake of
    the partnership, making all their desires
    serve this union. Such a relationship frees
    the act from a sense of duty and transforms
    it into an act of longing and love. Whoever
    wishes to learn about this type of love
    should study Shir HaShirim, and its
    intention will become clear.
    The lesson:
    Since there are multiple dimensions to
    our relationship with the Creator, we find
    different approaches to divine service,
    usually aligned with each person’s
    spiritual nature. All are beloved and all
    are desirable by Hashem.
    For example, Rabbi Mintzberg explained
    that the Brisk yeshiva emphasized serving
    primarily in the manner of the servant,

    who carries out exactly what the Master
    commanded without questions or
    investigations as to why. They ask less
    “why” (the reasons for mitzvot) and more
    “what” (what and how must be done). Yet
    this Brisk approach is not like the lazy
    servant mentioned above, but rather like a
    devoted and faithful servant, as it says of
    Moshe Rabbenu (Devarim 34:5): “And
    Moshe, the servant of Hashem”. The
    pleasure to the Creator, as Rashi explains
    (Num. 28:8) on “a fire-offering, a pleasing
    aroma to Hashem,” is: “a satisfaction
    before Me that I said and My will was
    done.”
    In contrast, the Chazon Ish served
    Hashem as a son, as is evident from his
    writings, in which he labored to explain
    everything in ways accessible to the
    heart’s understanding, just as a son seeks
    to understand his father’s ways. This
    approach emphasizes refining one’s
    character and performing mitzvot to
    improve oneself, for Hashem gains
    nothing from mitzvot, only joy in seeing
    His children become better, as it is said
    (Bereishit Rabbah 44:1): “The
    commandments were given only to refine
    people.”
    There is also the third way, the relationship
    of husband and wife, the path of the Baal
    Shem Tov, who taught to serve Hashem
    with the awareness that “Hashem and
    Israel are one.” Just as the wife does not
    act for herself like a son does, nor only
    for the other like the servant do, but from
    a deep desire to do her husband’s will—
    thereby strengthening their bond—so too
    in divine service. For example, when a
    wife prepares breakfast for her husband,
    it is not like the servant, who does so
    because it is his duty, nor like the son,
    who does so to improve himself and
    please his father. Rather, she prepares it
    as part of their connection. When her
    husband enjoys the meal, she herself feels
    satisfaction, which in turn strengthens the
    bond between them. Similarly, in serving
    the Creator, some perform mitzvot
    because it feels good and uplifting, for
    this connects them to their Creator. Their
    only desire is to bring pleasure to Him.
    For instance, in prayer one may pray as a
    servant, fulfilling the commandment of
    prayer: “And you shall serve Hashem,”
    which the Sages interpreted: “What is
    service of the heart? This is prayer.” Thus
    one may stand in prayer intending to
    fulfill his Master’s command. Since this
    is done more out of obligation than desire,
    the focus often wears thin over time, and

    the person may just wish to finish quickly
    and move on. Another may pray as a son,
    requesting his needs from his father,
    knowing it is his father’s will that he ask.
    The Sages taught that Hashem longs for
    our prayers. Ramban even ruled that
    Torah law requires prayer only in times of
    trouble, like a son turning to his father for
    rescue. Yet sometimes people, having all
    they need, lack heartfelt motivation to
    pray.
    But there is also the third way—one
    stands in prayer seeking to bond with the
    Creator, with the sole aim of strengthening
    the love between them and pouring out
    one’s heart. Such prayer is not an act of
    compulsion, nor primarily a request for
    needs, but wholly an act of love and
    emotion.
    This is not to minimize the importance of
    any form of divine service—all are
    precious. Nevertheless, it is clear that the
    way in which a person feels truly bonded
    to the Creator is the most secure path, as
    Rashi already taught (Deut. 6:5):
    “Perform His words out of love. One who
    serves out of love is not comparable to
    one who serves out of fear. He who serves
    his master out of fear—when the burden
    is too heavy, he leaves him and goes.”
    Now let us return to the work of Elul. In
    which of these three modes does its light
    shine? The hint seems clear: Elul follows
    the month of Av, as the name Av means a
    father, teaches that in Av we must
    strengthen our relationship with the
    Creator as a son to a father. Immediately
    afterward comes Elul, in which we must
    serve with love, as a husband and wife.
    The ultimate bond of love with the
    Creator is not born of fear or even duty,
    but of oneness—when our will and His
    will become inseparable. This is the
    calling of Elul: to rise above mere
    obligation or even the longing of a child,
    and to enter the embrace of love, where
    every mitzvah and every prayer becomes
    an act of closeness. This is the essence of
    Ani leDodi veDodi li—I turn to my
    Beloved, and in Elul I discover that my
    Beloved is already with me.