Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    IS A BEDIKAS CHAMETZ ROBOT KOSHER?

    The night before
    Pesach, we search
    for chametz on our
    property (bedikas
    chametz). By
    rabbinic decree,
    it is not enough
    to nullify our
    chametz but we must also search for,
    and destroy, our chametz, as well. The
    Roomba, a robotic vacuum cleaner that
    autonomously cleans your floors, has
    been available for over twenty years.
    Imagine a more advanced version, an
    autonomous chametz detector (ACD),
    with arms and legs that can go through
    your whole house (including drawers,
    closets, pockets and knapsacks), find any
    chametz and remove it. Is a contraption
    like that sufficient for bedikas chametz?
    I. Machine Checking
    Rav Dov Lior (cont., Israel) was asked
    a related question. If someone invents
    an electronic chametz detector (ECD),
    for example a machine the sniffs out
    gluten, can the device be used for
    bedikas chametz? Rav Lior responds
    that if the ECD is tested thoroughly to
    ensure it works properly, then a negative

    result would be sufficient for bedikas
    chametz. However, it is unwise to use
    such a machine because of the possibility
    of a false positive. What if the ECD is
    triggered by a minute amount of chametz
    or by chametz that is in a place we are
    not required to check? The positive result
    would force you to do extra cleaning and
    checking (Responsa Devar Chevron,
    Orach Chaim, vol. 2 no. 271).
    A bedikas chametz machine like that
    requires human interaction. Imagine a
    machine that autonomously checks for
    chametz while you relax or take care of
    other things. Can you use that for bedikas
    chametz? Effectively, the ACD serves
    like an agent, a shali’ach. In general, it is
    best for the homeowner to do at least part
    of the bedikas chametz by himself rather
    than hand off the mitzvah to someone
    else (Magen Avraham 432:5). If that is
    not possible, he can appoint a shali’ach
    to check for chametz. Indeed, it seems
    from the Gemara (Pesachim 4b) that in
    some places they hired a person to search
    for chametz but the homeowner did a
    little searching himself (Pri Megadim,
    Eshel Avraham 532:5). However, we are
    discussing a machine, not a shali’ach.

    II. Unrequested Assistance
    Consider someone driving
    home for bedikas chametz
    who gets stuck in traffic.
    Ideally, he should call and
    appoint someone a shali’ach
    to check for him. If he fails to
    do so, and a concerned friend,
    guest or relative checks
    for chametz without being
    appointed, does this suffice
    for the mitzvah? When the
    man finally arrives home
    late at night, does he need to
    check for chametz? Rav Shlomo Zalman
    Auerbach (20th cen., Israel) writes that
    bedikas chametz has value even without
    being appointed a shali’ach because it
    prevents the individual from violating
    the prohibition against owning chametz
    on Pesach. All Jews are responsible
    for each other’s religious wellbeing.
    However, a shali’ach fulfills the mitzvah
    on behalf of the homeowner and recites
    the blessing on bedikas chametz whereas
    the unappointed friend does not fulfill
    the mitzvah nor recite the blessing
    (Minchas Shlomo, second edition, 58:4).
    Therefore, when the man finally arrives
    home, presumably he must fulfill the
    mitzvah and conduct his own search
    for chametz even if his friend already
    did it.
    I believe we see a similar ruling in the
    laws of mourning. Someone whose
    close relative passes away but has
    not yet been buried has the status of
    an onen. An onen does not perform
    mitzvos, although he is still bound by
    the Torah’s prohibitions. What does
    an onen do about bedikas chametz?
    Rav Yehudah Ayash (18th cen.,
    Algeria) writes that while an onen is
    exempt from bedikas chametz, others

    can check for him on their own (me-
    atzmam), meaning without being

    appointed a shali’ach. They do not
    fulfill the mitzvah and do not recite the
    blessing but they help him avoid the
    prohibition against owning chametz on
    Pesach (Responsa Beis Yehudah, no.
    5). Rav Ephraim Zalman Margoliyos
    (19th cen., Ukraine) disagrees about the
    appointment of a shali’ach. Since this
    is a mitzvah with a limited timeframe
    that can be fulfilled with no effort,
    an onen can appoint a shali’ach to
    do bedikas chametz who then recites
    the blessing (Hilchos Onen, par. 8).
    According to Rav Ayash, someone
    who is not appointed a shali’ach can
    do bedikas chametz for another person.
    Rav Margoliyos does not disagree but
    believes we do not need that concept

    for an onen. More recently, Rav Nassan
    Gestetner (20th cen., Israel) questions
    Rav Margoliyos’ claim that an onen,
    who is exempt from the mitzvah, can
    appoint a shali’ach. If he is exempt, then
    he cannot appoint someone else to do a

    mitzvah from which he is exempt (Le-
    Horos Nassan, vol. 13 no. 93).

    III. Man and Machine
    We see that someone or something
    that is not a shali’ach cannot fulfill the
    mitzvah for a person. A machine cannot
    be a shali’ach and therefore cannot fulfill
    the mitzvah of bedikas chametz for its
    owner. One could suggest that a machine
    is merely an extension of its owner. For
    example, someone who uses a feather
    and spoon during bedikas chametz to
    gather pieces of chametz is using the
    feather and spoon as an extension of his
    hands. No one would suggest that he
    does not fulfill the mitzvah because he
    is using utensils. However, he holds the
    utensils in his hands so they are literally
    extensions of him. In contrast, the ACD
    moves autonomously, independent of
    any person, and cannot be considered an
    extension of the person.
    Rav Lior (loc. cit.) adds another
    possibility regarding the electronic
    chametz detector. Rav Shlomo Kluger
    (19th cen., Ukraine) writes that a room
    obtains a different status if it is cleaned
    completely of chametz more than three
    days before the night of bedikas chametz.
    After three days without chametz, the
    room gains a presumption (chazakah) of
    lacking chametz. It is like a room where
    chametz is never brought that does not
    require bedikas chametz (Chochmas
    Shlomo 433:11). If you use a chametz
    detector three days before bedikas
    chametz, any room it declares free of
    chametz does not need to be checked
    (assuming no one brought new chametz
    there). Similarly, you can use an ACD to
    clean your house of chametz three days
    before bedikas chametz. Although you
    should still check one room just to fulfill
    the mitzvah.