Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    LAVAN AND THE SHIDDUCH CRISIS

    For many singles
    who deeply wish
    to marry but have
    not yet found the
    right partner, the
    pain is not only
    personal. It carries a
    broader dimension as
    well. There is also the quiet absence of the
    families, children and generations that have
    not yet emerged. The individual story is real
    and pressing, but it is also part of a larger
    national concern. Jewish continuity is built
    through the families we form.
    I. Lavan’s Destructive Plan
    “Arami oved avi, An Aramean sought to
    destroy my father.”
    The Pesach Haggadah contrasts Pharaoh,
    who decreed only against the males, with
    Lavan, who sought to uproot everything. As
    it says, “An Aramean sought to destroy my
    father” (Deut. 26:5).
    This is puzzling: where do we ever find
    that Lavan attempted something so extreme
    as trying to kill his grandchildren? On the
    contrary, he appears to have loved them and
    exerted significant effort to keep them from
    leaving him.

    Many explanations have been offered. Rav
    Mordechai Gimpel Yaffe (19th cen., Russia)
    in his Haggadas Mordechai quotes Rav
    Yosef Peimer of Slutzk (19th cen., Russia),
    a primary student of Rav Chaim Volozhiner.
    The Gemara (Gittin 64b) says: if a man
    appoints an agent and says, “Go and betroth
    a woman for me,” and the agent dies, the man
    becomes forbidden to marry any woman.
    We assume the agent fulfilled his mission,
    and any woman might be related to the one
    he betrothed on his behalf. He cannot risk
    marrying his unknown wife’s sister, mother
    or daughter. Therefore, out of doubt whom
    the agent betrothed on his behalf, the man
    must remain single forever.
    Eliezer served as the agent to betroth a wife
    for Yitzchak, as noted by Tosafos (in Kesubos
    7b, s.v. she-ne’emar). The midrash relates that
    Lavan placed a poisoned dish before Eliezer,
    attempting to kill him. Through Avraham’s
    merit, the dishes were switched, and Besuel
    ate from it and died instead of Eliezer (Yalkut
    Shimoni, Chayei Sarah, par. 109).
    However, had Lavan succeeded in killing
    Eliezer, Yitzchak would have been unable
    to marry at all. He might already have been
    betrothed, unknowingly, to a close relative
    of any given woman, rendering the potential

    wife forbidden to him. Out of doubt,
    he would have been forbidden to
    marry any woman. Lavan would
    have succeeded in ending the line
    of Yitzchak and preventing the
    Jewish people from coming into
    existence. This is the meaning of
    the Haggadah’s claim that Lavan
    “sought to uproot everything.”
    This interpretation carries
    contemporary resonance. An
    unrealized marriage is a private loss,
    but it also carries consequences that
    echo far beyond the individual. In our
    own time, when many remain single
    despite sincere effort, it is worth considering
    not only the depth of their personal challenge
    but also the broader significance of the
    children and grandchildren who were never
    born.
    II. Expanding the Search
    At the same time, an objection to this
    interpretation suggests a path forward. Rav
    Shlomo Wahrman 21st cen., US) challenges
    this creative interpretation of Rav Yosef
    Slutzker. Avraham’s original instruction
    directed Eliezer to a specific place: “Go to
    my land and my birthplace, and there find
    a wife for Yitzchak my son” (Gen. 24:4).
    Eliezer was only an agent to betroth, on
    behalf of Yitzchak, a woman from Ur
    Kasdim (Rashi, Gen. 24:7). Therefore,
    even if Eliezer had died, Yitzchak could
    have married a woman from someplace
    else (Oros Ha-Pesach, ch. 50).
    Rav Wahrman implies that sometimes a
    match is found in places you do not expect
    or want. Avraham wanted a match for
    Yitzchak from his family in Ur Kasdim.
    Had Lavan succeeded in killing Eliezer,
    Yitzchak could still have found a match in
    what they considered less prestigious places
    and families. The future of Yitzchak’s
    family did not depend exclusively on the
    one most “desirable” place and family. His
    children and descendants could still have
    been born, a glorious future could have
    emerged.
    Today also, sometimes the solution
    to shidduch challenges lies in moving
    beyond a narrow framework and widening
    the horizon: considering potential spouses
    from different communities, different
    backgrounds and different life paths.
    We often become overly fixed on our
    preconceived notions of what our spouses
    and our futures must look like. We miss
    potential for happiness and family because
    we are too rigid in our expectations. Of
    course, this does not apply to every single
    because everyone’s circumstances and
    experiences are different. But a wider
    pool of potential spouses means more
    opportunity for finding the right person.

    III. Unusual Places
    I would counter, in defense of Rav Yosef
    Slutzker, that Eliezer’s agency extended
    beyond the women in Ur Kasdim. Avraham
    instructed Eliezer that if he did not find
    someone appropriate and willing in Ur
    Kasdim then he may look elsewhere (Rashi,
    Gen. 24:7,49). Therefore, if Lavan had
    succeeded in killing Eliezer, Yitzchak would
    have been unable to marry women in both
    Eliezer’s primary pool of potential spouses
    in Ur Kasdim and secondary pools in every
    other place.
    However, Yitzchak still would have been
    able to marry women without close female
    relatives. A woman with no mother or sister
    would definitely be permissible to Yitzchak.
    If Eliezer had betrothed Yitzchak to this
    woman, then he would be marrying the right
    woman. If Eliezer had betrothed him to the
    woman’s sister, she is no longer alive and
    does forbid Yitzchak to marry the living sister.
    If the mother had already been deceased at
    the time of Eliezer’s journey, this orphan
    woman would be permissible to Yitzchak.
    Similarly, Yitzchak could marry a widow or
    divorcee who had been married at the time of
    Eliezer’s journey because Eliezer could not
    have betrothed Yitzchak to a married woman.
    Therefore, even if Lavan had succeeded in
    killing Eliezer, Yitzchak would still have had
    a limited pool of potential wives with whom
    to create the Jewish people.
    Similarly today, too many people look to
    marry within a narrow spectrum and do not
    consider people with different circumstances.
    Rather than limiting their options, they can
    expand their pool of potential spouses by
    considering widow(er)s, divorcees and other
    people even slightly outside the standard life
    trajectory.
    Expanding the search does not mean
    compromising on core values. It means
    recognizing that the building of a Jewish
    home, and the generations that follow, may
    depend on the willingness to look beyond
    some – but not all – familiar boundaries.
    In doing so, one not only increases the
    possibility of finding the right partner but
    also contributes to the enduring future of the
    Jewish people.