Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    MATZAH – TO ELEVATE AND CONQUER AREAS OF SPIRITUAL WEAKNES

    The Mishna
    (Pesachim 35a)
    enumerates the types
    of grains that can be
    used for making
    matzah to fulfill the
    mitzva of eating
    matzah on Pesach. The Gemara notes that the
    five grains listed in the Mishna are an
    exhaustive list, implying that—for example—
    rice or millet, which are not mentioned in the
    Mishna, cannot be used to make matzah. What
    is wrong with using rice or millet? The Gemara
    infers a connection between chometz and
    matzah from the pasuk “You shall not eat upon
    it chometz, seven days you shall eat upon it
    matzah, the bread of poverty…” (Devorim
    16:3): That which can potentially become
    chometz(leavened) is the type of grain from
    which we can make matzah. Rice, millet, and
    other grains that are not listed in the Mishna
    can reach the state of sirachon (spoilage) but
    they cannot reach the state of chimutz
    (leavened).
    This concept may seem counterintuitive.
    Since we are so particular about preventing
    matzah from becoming chometz, shouldn’t we
    go out of our way, when baking our matzah, to
    specifically use grains which do not leaven?
    Why do we put ourselves in a situation where,
    if the dough is not baked quickly enough, it will
    become chometz? With all the difficult
    stringencies that are involved in baking matzah,
    why didn’t the Torah sanction the use of a type
    of grain that will never become chometz? Why
    does the Torah insist that we use a type of grain
    which could become chometz, necessitating
    the baker to zealously guard that it does not so
    become?
    The Tolner Rebbe from Yerushalayim gave
    several drashas when he was in Los Angeles for
    Parsha Bo several years ago. In one of his
    drashas, he commented that in this particular
    halacha lies a great practical lesson.
    Chazal teach that chometz is symbolic of the
    Yetzer haRah (evil inclination). On the other
    hand, matzah is symbolic of the Yetzer haTov
    (good inclination). Chometz rises. It is puffy. It
    is blown up. This is symbolic of a person’s
    haughtiness and passions. Matzah, which is
    plain and is flat, does not rise or get blown up.
    It is not haughty. It represents modesty,
    humility and the ability to manage with the
    bare necessities of life. In other words, chometz
    and matzah are at the opposite ends of the
    spectrum. Chometz represents negative
    spiritual character traits, and matzah represents
    positive spiritual character traits.
    The lesson, therefore, is that the Torah wants
    us to take that very thing that could potentially
    become chometz and make it into matzah.
    Extending the analogy of the Yetzer haRah and
    Yetzer haTov, the Torah wants us to take that
    which is our Yetzer haRah (our problems, our
    temptations, and our foibles) and convert it to
    Yetzer haTov. This means that man’s spiritual
    mission is to try to work on those very
    personality traits and characteristics that in the
    past have proven to be his weak points. If a
    person is mute then he will not receive reward
    in the World to Come for not speaking lashon
    haRah (gossip, slander, etc.). That is not his
    problem. The reason that it is not his problem is
    because of an unfortunate physical disability.
    But nevertheless, he will not receive reward for
    that because there is no challenge.
    Likewise, for example, if a person is
    unfortunately blind, he has no challenge of
    “shmiras aynayim” (guarding his eyes) from
    viewing inappropriate matters. That is not his
    challenge. The avodas ha’adam (man’s spiritual
    challenge) is to take those very things that are
    areas of spiritual weakness, where perhaps in
    the past he has fallen short of the Torah’s ideals,
    and to conquer them and elevate them. In fact,
    perhaps he will even be able to take that very
    thing and turn it into a dvar mitzvah.
    Let the person channel his passions—which
    have perhaps led him astray in the past—in a
    positive direction. This is the symbolism of the
    chometz and the matzah. Don’t try making
    matzah out of something that cannot become
    chometz anyway. That is no great
    accomplishment! Take something that without
    careful watching and care can become chometz.
    That is the very item we turn into a “cheftza
    d’mitzvah” (an entity with which a positive
    command is fulfilled).
    This halacha regarding the grains with which
    matzah may be baked is a metaphor for a
    person’s spiritual mission. We must seek out
    that which has been our Yetzer haRah and turn
    it into our Yetzer haTov.