Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    PARSAHAT BEHAALOTECHA: ATTITUDE IS ALTITUDE

    The Torah in Parashat
    Behaalotecha tells
    of Beneh Yisrael’s
    departure from Mount
    Sinai, where they had
    been encamped for nearly a year: “Va’yis’u
    Me’Har Hashem” – “They journeyed from the
    Mountain of G-d” (10:33).
    The Talmud Yerushalmi, in Masechet Ta’anit,
    comments that Beneh Yisrael left Mount Sinai
    like children run from school, hurrying before
    the teacher can teach more or give more
    assignments. This comment appears also in
    the Midrash, which famously describes Beneh
    Yisrael as leaving Sinai “Ke’tinok Ha’bore’ah
    Mi’bet Ha’sefer” – “like a child running away
    from school.” They left Sinai quickly, fearful
    of receiving more Misvot.
    After telling of the journey from Sinai, the
    Torah presents the two verses of “Va’yehi
    Bi’nso’a Ha’aron” and “U’be’nuho Yomar,”
    the pronouncements which Moshe made
    when the nation began journeying, and when
    they encamped. In the Torah scroll, this pair of
    verses is surrounded by two unusual symbols
    – an upside-down letter “Nun.” The Gemara
    explains that these symbols were added to
    indicate that these two verses do not actually
    belong here, and they were placed here “to
    separate between one catastrophe and another
    catastrophe.” Before these two verses, the
    Torah tells of Beneh Yisrael’s departure from

    Sinai, and after these verses, it tells of their
    complaints during travel, for which they were
    severely punished. The Torah did not want
    these two calamities to appear one right after
    the other, and so it interrupted the narrative
    with the two verses of “Va’yehi Bi’nso’a
    Ha’aron” and “U’be’nuho Yomar.”
    It emerges, then, that Beneh Yisrael’s
    departure from Sinai, their “running” like
    “a child running away from school,” is
    considered a “catastrophe” – a catastrophe
    so severe that the Torah found it necessary to
    make a separation between this story and the
    catastrophic episode that followed.
    We must wonder, how could Beneh Yisrael’s
    departure from Sinai have possibly resembled
    children running away from school? Beneh
    Yisrael did not leave Mount Sinai until they
    were instructed to do so. The Torah in this
    Parasha describes in great detail how Beneh
    Yisrael strictly followed G-d, journeying
    when the special cloud which signified G-d’s
    presence rose, and encamping when the cloud
    descended. They did not leave Sinai a minute
    before G-d wanted them to. In what way are
    they considered to have “escaped”?
    Rav Yehuda Leib Chasman (1869-1936), in
    Or Yahel, explains that indeed, Beneh Yisrael
    did not outwardly do anything wrong. They
    left Sinai precisely when they were told to,
    and not a moment earlier. The problem was

    in their mind, in their attitude. They left
    gleefully, relieved that they would not be
    receiving any more commands. This was
    the “catastrophe” – that they celebrated their
    departure from Sinai.
    Rav Chasman developed this idea further by
    noting the contrast between Beneh Yisrael’s
    departure from Sinai and their departure from
    the shores of the sea a year earlier. The Torah
    tells in the Book of Shemot (15:22), “Va’yasa
    Moshe Et Yisrael Mi’Yam Suf” – “Moshe
    had Yisrael journey from the Sea of Reeds.”
    The Rabbis explained that Moshe needed to
    force Beneh Yisrael to leave the seashore,
    because they wanted to remain there to collect
    all the riches from the Egyptians’ chariots,
    which had washed ashore after the Egyptian
    army was drowned at sea. When it came to
    precious jewels, Beneh Yisrael were eager to
    stay to collect more; when it came to Misvot,
    they were eager to leave before they received
    more. This was the “catastrophe” – that they
    showed greater affection for material goods
    than for spiritual goods; that they were more
    attracted to riches than to Misvot.
    The proper attitude towards Misvot is
    reflected earlier in the Parasha, in the story
    of the Teme’im – those who were impure and
    were thus unable to offer the Pesach sacrifice
    (9:1-14). These men approached Moshe and
    bemoaned their inability to participate in this
    precious Misva. G-d responded favorably to

    their request, and granted them the opportunity
    to bring the sacrifice one month later, on the
    14th of Iyar (an occasion that is commonly
    called “Pesach Sheni” – “the second Pesach”).
    This is the kind of attitude we should have
    towards Misvot – a desire to do more, not a
    desire to do less.
    There is an expression, “Attitude is altitude.”
    Meaning, the way we grow is by developing
    a proper attitude and mindset. Our actions are
    not always going to be perfect, but we must
    ensure that at least we approach life with the
    correct attitude, with our priorities in place,
    with an awareness of what’s more important
    and what’s less important. Like Beneh Yisrael,
    we are not able to remain forever at “the
    Mountain of G-d,” engrossed in Torah and
    Misvot at all times. Nevertheless, we should
    aspire to the level of sanctity and devotion
    which our ancestors attained at that special
    site, and make Torah and Misvot our highest
    priority and greatest wish.