Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    PARSHAS DEVARIM: CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF CHINUCH CONCESSIONS

    The idea was good in
    my eyes. (1:23)
    Parashas Devarim
    begins with Moshe
    rabbeinu reviewing
    the main events that
    occurred in the 39 years since the Jewish
    People left Har Sinai. In recalling their
    request to send meraglim to reconnoiter
    Eretz Yisrael before proceeding to the
    Land, Moshe castigates them for the
    disorderly manner with which they made
    their request, but he concedes that “the
    idea was good in my eyes.”
    The Talmud (Sotah 34b) deduces from
    Moshe’s statement — “The idea was
    good in my eyes” — that he felt that it
    was a good idea to send meraglim, but
    Hashem did not. Hashem was aware that
    sending spies would end in disaster, and
    He did not want them to go.
    This is difficult to understand. If Hashem
    knew that the meraglim would end up
    poisoning the minds of the nation against
    Eretz Yisrael, why did He agree that they

    could go? Hashem should have told
    Moshe, “Tell them that I am G-d, I call
    the shots, and I said ‘NO!’”?
    Rabbi Mottel Katz, the late Rosh
    Yeshivah of Telz in Cleveland, Ohio,
    deduces an important lesson in chinuch
    from this incident.
    There are times that children want to do
    something that their parents deem
    inappropriate. Our parental instincts tell
    us to lay down the law and prohibit them
    from doing what they want to do. We
    reason to ourselves that we are required
    to be mechanech our children, and
    sometimes this means that we have to
    say, “No.”
    But is it always right to say no?
    We learn from the meraglim, says Rabbi
    Katz, that there are times that we have to
    concede, even if we know that what our
    children want to do is wrong!
    Hashem realized that the people simply
    were not ready to accept His denial of
    their request. Had Moshe returned from
    Hashem with a negative response, they

    would have thought to
    themselves, “How are we
    supposed to go and fight
    against a country without
    sending spies? Everyone
    knows that you do not
    fight without intelligence
    information.”
    Had Klal Yisrael been on
    a high-enough spiritual
    level to accept Hashem’s
    refusal, He would have said no. But
    Hashem realized they were not ready to
    accept His decision wholeheartedly, so
    He did not refuse their request.
    Sometimes, notes Rabbi Katz, chinuch is
    all about conceding. We have to know
    when our children are able to accept a
    “no,” and when they are just too set on
    doing what they intend to do to accept
    our refusal.
    This concept is actually mentioned
    clearly in the Talmud (Yevamos 65b) as
    well: “Just as it is a mitzvah to say words
    that will be accepted, it is also a mitzvah
    not to say words that will not be
    accepted.”
    Rabbi Motel Katz adds a personal
    anecdote that is so incredible that, had
    I not seen it myself in his notes and
    confirmed the authenticity of the notes
    with his son, I would never have
    included it here. The incident that he
    describes, while not dated, must have
    occurred in the late 1940s or early 50s.
    “One day, the boys came over to me in
    yeshivah and asked me to change the
    yeshivah schedule for one night,”
    writes Rabbi Katz. “They wanted to
    daven Maariv earlier than we regularly
    did.
    “When I asked them why they wanted
    to daven early, they explained that
    there was a heavyweight championship
    bout being fought in New York that
    night, and they wanted to listen to the
    match on the radio. If we would daven
    at the regular time, they would miss
    the fight.”
    “Of course, the very request was
    inappropriate, not to mention the
    questionable propriety of yeshivah
    students listening to a fight between
    two humans trained to beat each other
    until one of them could no longer
    stand up.”
    “I realized that if I refused, the boys

    simply would not understand why I
    refused. Having grown up in America,
    they were accustomed to the finest, most
    respectable citizens flying in from all
    over the country to view these matches.
    They considered watching or listening to
    the radio broadcast of two adults
    pummeling each other a perfectly normal
    means of recreation.”
    “I decided,” concludes Rabbi Katz, “that
    since these boys would not begin to
    understand why I was refusing their
    request, it would be better to allow them
    to daven early and listen to the match.”
    I am sure that this was probably one of
    many difficult dilemmas Rabbi Katz had
    to face. He had learned in Telz back in
    Europe. What would his Roshei Yeshivah
    have thought of such a request?
    Rabbi Mordechai Gifter often related his
    memories of his arrival in Telz and
    finding that the only thing that existed
    there was Torah. How difficult it must
    have been for a person who had been
    privy to witness such exalted devotion to
    Torah to permit his students to end their
    studies early for a heavyweight
    championship match.
    But this was a new world. The student
    body of Telz at the time was culled from
    various small communities throughout
    the United States; many of them had
    attended public elementary schools in
    their youth. They could not be expected
    to fully appreciate the value of Torah.
    Of course, there are many cases in which
    parents and mechanchim have to say no.
    But in this case, Rav Motel learned from
    the best Teacher. If Hashem permitted
    Klal Yisrael to do something that He
    knew was wrong when He realized they
    could not accept His refusal, then the
    Rosh Yeshivah of Telz had to find it in
    himself to do the same.
    And so, dear parents, must we.