Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    PARSHAS VAYIKRA: A HUMBLE MAN WITH A (POTENTIALLY) NOT SO HUMBLE CHILDHOOD

    The Medrash
    Rabbah, on the
    opening words of
    Sefer Vayikra
    (“Vayikra Hashem el
    M o s h e … “ ) ,
    mentions that Moshe Rabbeinu actually
    had ten different names. However,
    Hashem made it a point to call Moshe
    only by the name he was given by
    Basya, Paroh’s daughter. The Torah
    says that she called him Moshe “Ki min
    hamayim mishe-seyhu” (Shemos 2:10).
    The simple reading of this Medrash is
    that the reason HaKadosh Baruch Hu
    chose to use that name was to give
    everlasting honor to Paroh’s daughter.
    She, in effect, saved the life of Moshe,
    going against her father’s decree and
    the “law of the land” that all Hebrew
    boys were to be drowned. Thus, even
    though he had a name Tuvya and a
    name Avigdor among many other
    names, Hashem addressed him by the
    name Moshe, given to him by the

    woman who risked her life and saved
    him from death by drowning.
    The Kesav Sofer, however, gives an
    interesting alternative interpretation of
    why Hashem specifically called Moshe
    by the name Moshe. The Gemara in
    Maseches Nedarim (38a) says, “The
    Holy One Blessed be He does not cause
    prophecy and Ruach haKodesh (the
    power of His Divine Presence) to rest
    on anyone who is not mighty, wealthy,
    wise, and humble. This is all learned
    out from Moshe (who was all of the
    above).”
    We can understand that modesty and
    humility are prerequisites for being a
    recipient of prophecy and Ruach
    haKodesh. But where do we find in
    Yiddishkeit that a person’s strength or
    wisdom should be a factor in his ability
    to receive Divine prophecy? We
    normally do not give special
    consideration to gevurah. Chochma,
    perhaps yes, but gevurah, no. The
    Kesav Sofer explains that if a person is

    a 90-pound weakling and is not
    very bright and is not very
    successful, and as a result he is
    also not very wealthy, the fact that
    such a person is modest is no
    ‘kuntz‘. It does not demonstrate a
    major accomplishment. What,
    after all, does he possess that
    would justify his strutting around
    proudly? It is only right that a
    person who does not have
    anything going for himself should
    be modest!
    The Gemara (Pesachim 113b) states
    that one of the four categories of people
    who are intolerable is the poor braggart
    (dal gayeh). He is impoverished, and
    nevertheless he thinks of himself in
    haughty terms.
    On the other hand, a person who has all
    these attributes: He is a “gibor“. He is a
    “chochom“. He is an “ashir“. And yet,
    he remains an “anav” – that, according
    to the Kesav Sofer, is real humility.
    This person has what to be proud of and
    even what to be arrogant about, and
    yet he maintains his modest bearing
    – that is a real anav. It is not “gevurah”
    or “chochma” or “ashirus” per se that
    is required. Humility qualifies a
    person for nevuah and Ruach
    haKodesh. Nevertheless, true anivus
    is tested when a person has what to
    be arrogant about and nevertheless
    maintains his humility.
    When a person is Rav Moshe
    Feinstein, zecher tzadik l’vracha, and
    knows kol haTorah kulah and has
    reviewed Shulchan Aruch 150 times
    and knows every comment of the Pri
    Megadim and nevertheless, when he
    is walking on the street on the Lower
    East Side and someone calls out
    “Hey, Moshe!” (calling out to
    somebody else with the name Moshe)
    this Gadol HaDor turns around and
    thinks the fellow is calling out to
    him—that demonstrates humility!
    Rav Moshe, zt”l, was a humble
    person despite the fact that he had so
    much going for him. The same is true
    of virtually all the Gedolim. They are
    men with tremendous intellect and
    nevertheless they are humble. That is
    true anivus.

    Rav Yosef Salant (the Be’er Yosef)
    comments on the Chazal that the
    Matriarch Sora was a beautiful woman.
    The Gemara says (Megilla 14a) that
    Yiska daughter of Charan (mentioned
    in Bereshis 11:29) was really Sora and
    two explanations are given for this
    derivation. The first explanation is
    she’sachsa b’Ruach haKodesh (that she
    spoke with Divine Inspiration). The
    second explanation is that she is called
    Yiska because everyone talked about
    her beauty (she’haKol sochin b’yofya).
    There cannot be two more diametrically
    opposed praises than these two
    interpretations. One is “She possesses
    Ruach haKodesh“; the other one is
    “She was a knockout beauty!” We don’t
    usually put those two accolades in the
    same sentence.
    The Be’er Yosef explains: No, because
    she was the talk of the town as the most
    beautiful of women and nevertheless,
    she did not let those praises go to her
    head, that is why she merited to speak
    with Ruach HaKodesh.
    That brings us full circle to where we
    began: Moshe Rabbeinu grew up in the
    palace of Paroh. He was a prince. He
    had the world on a platter and had
    everything going for him. Nevertheless,
    he was an anav. That is why Hashem
    chose to address him with no other
    name than the name he was given by
    Paroh’s daughter. Basya bas Paroh put
    him in the palace and gave him every
    excuse in the world to think of himself
    proudly as the Prince of Egypt.
    Nevertheless, Moshe retained his
    humility. To highlight this personality
    accomplishment, Hashem chose to
    always address him by the name he was
    given by the Princess of Egypt, Basya
    bas Paroh!