08 Mar PARSHAS ZACHOR (VAYIKRA): THE GREATEST ACCOLADE GIVEN TO MORDECHAI:
The last pasuk
[verse] in the
Megilla reads
“For Mordechai,
the Yehudi, was
viceroy to King
Ahashuerus; he
was a great man among the Jews,
and found favor with the multitude
of his brothers (ratzui l’rov echav);
he sought the good of his people and
spoke with peace to all his posterity.
(v’dover shalom l’chol zar’oh)” [Esther
10:3]
The Ibn Ezra makes two very interesting
comments on this pasuk. He
says regarding the phrase “he found
favor with the multitude (literally the
majority) of his brothers,” that because
of jealousy, a person cannot
find favor with everyone. It is impos sible
to be perfectly popular.
Then the Ibn Ezra comments on the
buildup of praises that we have in the
pasuk. The concluding, and seemingly
greatest praise is that “he spoke
with peace to all his posterity.” The
Ibn Ezra comments that this means
he was on good terms with all his
children and grandchildren.
This seems anti-climactic. Is this
the greatest thing we can find to say
about Mordechai HaYehudi? The
Ibn Ezra says this is indeed a great
praise.
Think of all the children and grandchildren
that Mordechai had. Did
each one turn out exactly like Mordechai
would have wanted? If Mordechai
would have wanted all his
children and grandchildren to become
Torah scholars, do we expect
that is the way it would have worked
out? Or, if he wanted them all to be
expert businesspersons, do we expect
that is the way it would turn
out? Maybe there would be a black
sheep in the family that became a
scholar!
And yet, he spoke in peace to all
descendants. He was able to maintain
a peaceful relationship with all
his children and all his grandchildren.
This, the Ibn Ezra tells us, is a
great thing. Because of the natural
fear that children have towards parents,
it is not always true that there is
a loving relationship between parents
and children. Therefore if Mordechai
could maintain such a relationship,
this is indeed the highest
accolade that the Torah can offer
him.
I think this is a great ethical lesson
for us. We try to raise children, and
we have certain ideals and standards
of how we would like our children to
be. It does not always turn out like
that. But we should always strive to
maintain a relationship where we
can, at least, speak peacefully with
all our offspring.
—————————-
One Who Gladdens Hearts on
Purim is Compared to G-d
The Ramba”m in the Laws of Yom
Tov [6:18] speaks about the nature of
the Mitzvah of Simchas Yom Tov.
The Ramba”m says, “when he eats
and drinks, he has to feed the stranger,
the orphan, and widow together
with the other poor and unfortunate
people. However he who locks the
gates of his courtyard and sits down
to feast with his wife and children
but does not provide food for the
poor and embittered of spirit — such
is not the rejoicing of Mitzvah; it is
the rejoicing of one’s own stomach!”
In the Laws of Megilla [2:17] as
well, the Ramba”m speaks of the
mitzvah of rejoicing on Purim. There
the Ramba”m writes, “It is preferable
for a person to be excessive when
it comes to the Mitzvah of giving
gifts to the poor rather than to be excessive
when it comes to feasting
and sending food portions to friends,
because there is no greater or more
glorious rejoicing than to gladden
the hearts of the poor, the orphans,
the widows, and the strangers, for
one who gladdens the hearts of these
unfortunate individuals can be compared
to the Shechina (G-d’s Divine
Presence) as it is written [Yeshaya
57:15] ‘to revive the spirit of the
humble and to revive the heart of the
crushed.’”
It would seem to us that if we would
speculate when there is a greater
mitzvah to gladden the hearts of the
widows and orphans — on Yom Tov
or on Purim — we would logically
think that on Yom Tov there would
be a bigger mitzvah. Yom Tov, after
all, is a Biblical command. Purim is
Rabbinic in origin. Yet the Ramba”m
goes out of his way and says something
that he says very rarely in the
entire Mishneh Torah — “that one
who gladdens the hearts of these can
be compared to the Shechina!” He
does not say that concerning the
laws of Yom Tov.
What is the Ramba”m telling us
here by saying that a person who
makes the less fortunate happy on
Purim is comparable to G-d?
The Medrash in Esther says on the
pasuk “to know what is this (mah
ZEH) and about what is this (v’al
mah ZEH)” [Esther 4:5] that when
Esther queried Mordechai she was
alluding to something. She said
“What’s happening? What have we
done? Never in Jewish history has
there been such a decree as Haman
has issued. Have they perhaps denied
the pasuk ‘This is my G-d’
(ZEH Keyli) or perhaps they denied
the Ten Commandments about
which it is written ‘from this way
and that way (m’ZEH u-mi’ZEH)
were they written?”
The Medrash continues that Mordechai
responded and said that the
reason the Jews were suffering was a
result of the grandson of ‘Karahu.’
Who is ‘Karahu?’ ‘Karahu’ refers to
Amalek about which it is stated,
“Who happened to you (asher Korecha)
on the road” [Devorim 25:18].
Our Sages tell us that Amalek represents
the antithesis of Belief in this
world. Amalek denies the existence
of a Creator of the world.
When Mordechai told Esther that
the Jews are suffering because of
‘Karahu,’ he was saying that the
Jews were suffering because of a terrible,
terrible, lack of Emunah (belief).
This is a lack of belief that even
in our own times we don’t see. What
do I mean? We have Jews today who
do not believe — do they ‘believe’
more than the Jews in the time of
Mordechai and Esther?
What I mean is as follows: The Talmud
says that the reason the Jews
were deserving of destruction, was
that “they enjoyed the banquet of
that evil one” [Megilla 12a]. What
was so bad about partaking in the
banquet of Ahashuerus?
Was it Treife? Heaven Forbid! “The
drinking was according to the law,
nothing was forced” [Esther 1:8]. It
was Kosher as could be, according to
every stringent opinion. So what was
the sin? The sin was that the Jews attended
a Feast given by the gentile,
at which the gentiles took out the
Vessels of Service (Klei Shares) of
the Beis HaMikdash — and the Jews
sat there and kept on feasting!
Even Jews who today are totally assimilated,
who would not think twice
about eating at a non-kosher feast…
if their non-Jewish hosts would serve
them on the utensils stolen from the
holy Temple, their reaction would
be: Stop! “These are the utensils of
the Holy Temple.” Which Jew would
not get up and yell, “These are my
utensils! These are the vessels of our
Beis HaMikdash!”?
The fact that the Jews in Shushan
could sit there through a meal and
use those vessels was a terrible sin!
What was wrong with them? What
was wrong with those Jews was that
they were ‘hopeless Jews.’ They
were Jews who had lost all hope.
They had counted the 70 years of the
Exile, and knew that the Exile was
supposed to be over and yet the Redemption
had not yet come. Those
were Jews who had seen the building
of the Second Beis HaMikdash
stopped in its tracks. Those were
Jews who had come to the conclusion
that there would be no Redemption.
Those were Jews who said
“Moshiach is not going to come.”
Those were hopeless Jews.
The difference between those Jews
and the Jews of our day is that today,
as non-observant as a Jew may be,
he can still can believe in Judaism,
he can believe in G-d and redemption,
and he knows that there is hope.
That is what the story of Purim restored.
There was a decree. The Jews
were motivated to do Teshuva and
the Ribbono shel Olam came back
and breathed life into this dead body
of the Jewish people and gave them
hope. That is what happened on Purim.
G-d took His breath of Life and
restored hope to a forlorn nation.
Rav Hutner said there is a mitzvah
to emulate G-d. If G-d on Purim
brought the dead back to life, if He
took hopeless and down-trodden
Jews and gave them hope, it becomes
our Mitzvah on Purim to do
the same thing. Therefore the
Ramba”m says that on Purim there is
no greater mitzvah than to gladden
the hearts of the unfortunate and
downtrodden. The essence of the day
is to give hope, meaning, and comfort
to broken-spirited people… because
that is what
G-d did. A person therefore who
does this will be comparable to G-d.