Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    PSHAT VS KABBALLAH

    The day of Lag
    B’omer is the day
    that Rabbi Shimon
    Bar Yochai revealed
    to the world the
    deepest secrets of
    the Torah, known as
    the Kabbalah, written in the Sefer HaZohar.
    Though it was not only these secrets that
    were revealed in the Zohar; Mekubalim
    drew from the wellsprings of the Zohar many
    Halachot as well. However, many times the
    Halachot either written in or derived from
    the Zohar are contrary to those that are in the
    Shulchan Aruch, and the Poskim therefore
    discuss what to do in such an event.
    Do all agree?
    This discussion seems to be a difference
    of opinions between Sephardim and
    Ashkenazim. The Bet Yosef (who wrote
    the Shulchan Aruch), whom the Sephardim
    generally follow, wrote (קמא סימן (that the
    Zohar overrides the ruling of the Poskim: לא
    In .“שבקינן דברי” הזוהר מפני דברי הפוסקים
    contrast, the Rema, who is the Posek of
    the Ashkenazim, argued that we follow
    the poskim over the Zohar: מדברי לזוז ״אין

    הפוסקים אף אם היו דברי הזוהר חולקים עליהם. כן
    נראה לי דלא כבית יוסף״
    The Bet Yosef explained(כה‘ סי או״ח (that
    in reality any Posek who ruled contrary to
    the Zohar did so only because he hadn’t seen
    the Zohar’s opinion; had the Posek seen the
    words of the Zohar, surely he would change
    his mind and rule in accordance with the
    Zohar. The reason the Poskim didn’t see
    what the Zohar says is because the Zohar
    was hidden for about 1500 years after Rabbi
    Abba wrote all those wonderful secrets that
    were given to him by Rabbi Shimon Bar
    Yochai.
    Let’s give just one of the many examples of

    this concept. In the halachot of משנה לחם-
    Lechem Mishne on Shabbat (the two loaves

    of bread required on Shabbat meals), we
    learn that on Friday night we should cut
    the bottom loaf. The Bet Yosef says that
    according to the Pshat one should really cut
    the top bread; nevertheless, we don’t do that,
    rather we cut the bottom loaf since that is the
    opinion of the holy Zohar. The Bach argued
    on the Bet Yosef strongly asking how it’s
    possible that he ignores the Gemara’s ruling
    that one may not skip over a Mitzvah (אין

    המצוות על מעבירין (that’s in front of him and
    go to the Mitzvah under it because of the
    Zohar?!?!
    Later of poskim opinion
    Later poskim followed this principle as
    סימן כח,ס״ָק ) Berura Mishna The .well
    מב (who was the leading authority for the
    Ashkenazim, wrote to follow the Gemara
    and the Poskim over the Zohar and
    Kabbalah; with an exception–whenever
    the Poskim didn’t state their opinion or
    whenever the Poskim argue over a certain
    law, then the Zohar would will determine.
    Another exception is if the Kabbalah is
    more stringent than the Pshat, then we
    should follow the Kabbalah. Contrary to
    that, the Kaf Hachai,m who was the late
    that) סימן כה, ס״ק עה) wrote ,Posek Sefaradi
    the Sefaradi approach is the way Maran the
    Bet Yosef wrote (see above), that L’Halacha
    we go with the Zohar ruling.
    He brings the words of the Rav Mas’at
    even that) משאת בנימין סי‘ סב דף זן) Binyamin
    if all the poskim in the world would say
    differently from the Zohar, we still follow
    the Zohar over everybody.
    Sefer Petach Hadvir(ח עמוד ח״ב (‘writes
    that Maran the Shulchan Aruch always
    brings the Zohar to Halacha in his Sefer.
    Minhagim
    Moreover, this applies not only to
    Halachic matters but also to Minhagim–
    customs as well. Although the Shulchan
    Aruch wrote that one may not change
    any Minhag (custom) in any way, and
    proceeded to give a disclaimer in his
    introduction to his great essay, the Bet
    Yosef on the Tur, that if he might say
    something that is not with accordance
    with one’s Minhag, one should ignore his
    Psak and follow the Minhag, but when it
    came to the Zohar, he seemed to follow
    the Zohar over the Minhag. For example,
    he brings (נט‘ סי או״ח (the Minhag
    mentioned by the Rosh and Rabenu Yona
    that one may say “Kedusha” of “Yotser”
    and “U’va Letsion Goel’’ without a
    minyan (quorum of ten men), but since
    the Zohar holds otherwise we don’t
    follow the Minhag.
    Here as well the Rema (in Darkei Moshe
    ג ס״ק (‘argued and said that the Minhag
    must be kept even against the Zohar’s
    opinion.
    Since the Sephardim always follow the
    Shulchan Aruch, in this very case it isn’t
    any different, and one must follow his
    Psak that Kabbala overrides the Pshat
    and all other Poskim. Moreover, even if

    the Bet Yosef himself says differently than
    the Kabbalah, Sephardim must follow the
    . (כף החיים שם) .Kabbalah
    This also applies to the laws of Berachot,
    as whenever we have a doubt whether a
    Beracha should be said or not, the rule of
    thumb is that we usually don’t say the
    ,Surprisingly .)ספק ברכות להקל) Beracha
    when the Ari (the Ari was the main master
    of Kabbalah) says that a Beracha should
    be said we must say it even if the Poskim
    argue and even if the Shulchan Aruch holds
    חיד״א בברכי יוסף סי‘ מו) .said be t’shouldn it
    יא אות (it’s worthwhile to note that Chacham
    Ovadia argues on this ruling of the Chida.
    It’s interesting to note that Chacham
    Ovadia was also very opposed to this entire
    approach that Kabbala overrides Pshat, as
    he wrote many times that L’Halacha we
    only go according to Pshat. Concerning that
    which we brought above, Chacham Ovadia
    argued that it’s a misunderstanding of the
    concept, as the Halacha follows Kabbala
    only when it’s the Zohar itself against the
    Poskim, since the Zohar is an ancient Sefer
    written many years prior to the Poskim; but
    when the Gemara argues with the Zohar, or
    the Poskim argue with the Mekubalim, we
    always follow the Gemara and Poskim. (ראה
    .(באריכות בעין יצחק ח״ג עמוד רסד
    Final words
    The above is a rundown of the opinions on
    the matter of Kabbalah vs Pshat, but it’s
    important to note that in reality the Kabbalah
    and Pshat do not argue at all, but rather deal
    with two separate levels of the Torah which
    complement and complete each other. The
    Vilna Gaon explained that anyone who
    thinks they argue is mistaken. Therefore, all
    that the Poskim wrote was only in relation to
    how to direct us in the Halacha, since to us it
    looks like it’s contradictory and we have to
    act in one way or the other.
    The way the Mekubalim explain this ( חסד
    that is ) לאברהם בהקדמה לאור החמה על הזוהר
    the Torah has (so to speak) soul, body and
    clothing. The simple understanding of the
    Torah (Pshat) is the clothing part, while the
    laws and Mitzvot of the Torah is the body,
    and the Kabbalah is the soul.