Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    RESPECTING OUR WIVES: HONORING OURSELVES

    One of the
    most well-known

    examples of de-
    ception in the

    Torah is Lavan’s
    betrayal of Yaakov during his marriage
    arrangements. After Yaakov worked for
    seven years to marry Rachel, the woman

    he loved, Lavan tricked him by substi-
    tuting Leah for Rachel on the wedding

    night. Yaakov, unaware of the switch
    until the next morning, was shocked
    and confronted Lavan about this
    betrayal. In response, Lavan claimed
    it was customary in their region not to
    marry off the younger daughter before
    the elder. This forced Yaakov into an
    agreement to work an additional seven
    years to marry Rachel.
    Rachel was given to Yaakov
    immediately after the seven-day sheva
    brachot period for Leah, under a new
    agreement that Yaakov would work for
    Lavan for another seven years. During
    this time, Yaakov had every justification
    to work less diligently or to reduce the

    quality of his efforts, as he had been
    cheated into this arrangement. However,
    Rashi (29; 30) explains that Yaakov
    worked the additional seven years with
    the same integrity and dedication as he
    had during the first seven years.
    Why did he do this? One might argue
    it was due to Yaakov’s inherent honesty.
    However, another comment by Rashi
    (29; 12) suggests that from the moment
    Yaakov met Lavan, he hinted that he
    was well aware of Lavan’s deceitful
    nature and capable of being equally
    tricky if necessary. Yaakov essentially
    warned Lavan that any attempt to cheat
    him would be met with equal cunning.
    Despite this, Yaakov chose to maintain
    his integrity, showing his commitment
    to his values even in the face of Lavan’s
    treachery, why did he do this?
    Before attempting to answer this
    question, let us first examine how
    Yaakov’s grandfather, Avraham Avinu,
    dealt with Efron when purchasing a
    burial place for his wife, Sarah.

    Avraham approached
    Efron to purchase the Cave
    of Machpelah as a burial
    place for Sarah. Although
    Efron initially offered the
    land for free, he subtly
    insisted on an exorbitant
    price of 400 silver
    shekels. Avraham had the
    opportunity to accept the
    land for free or negotiate a
    fairer price, as is customary
    in real estate transactions.
    However, he chose not to
    bargain and allowed Efron
    to take advantage of him, paying the
    inflated price without objection.
    We can suggest that although
    Avraham Avinu could have negotiated
    a better price, he insisted on paying
    the high price to honor his wife, Sarah.
    Even though she was no longer alive,
    Avraham wanted to show her the utmost
    respect. The honor of one’s wife is not
    only for her but also reflects on the
    husband, their children, and the entire
    family. Avraham understood this
    deeply and refused to compromise
    Sarah’s dignity by bargaining.
    Through this act, Avraham taught
    us the importance of our matriarch
    Sarah and reminded us to always
    hold her in the highest regard. He
    also demonstrated the value of
    respecting one’s wife, as doing so
    elevates not only her but also oneself
    and one’s entire family.
    The same reasoning applies to
    Yaakov. He could have worked less
    diligently and produced less, as
    Lavan’s deceit might have justified
    such behavior. However, Yaakov
    chose to work with all his might and
    deliver the highest quality of work.
    Why did he do this? The answer
    lies in the fact that this labor was
    part of the payment for his marriage
    to his wife. Yaakov refused to
    compromise, as doing so would
    diminish the respect and honor
    he held for his wife. One does not
    bargain when it comes to the dignity
    and respect of his wife. Bargaining
    is for the flea market, not for matters
    of such profound significance.
    But this attitude was not only

    how Yaakov felt about his wives; it was
    a mutual feeling that worked both ways.
    Leah and Rachel also held their husband
    in high regard. We see this in many
    clear instances, such as the names they
    gave their children. For example, Leah
    named her firstborn Reuven, saying,
    “Since Hashem has seen my affliction,
    now my husband will love me.” This
    shows that her main concern was how
    her husband felt, highlighting her deep
    respect and longing for his affection.
    Another example is when Rachel
    asks for the dudaim that Reuven brought
    to his mother, Leah. These dudaim were
    clearly not ordinary plants; they were
    believed to have significant spiritual
    power. Some suggest that they had
    the ability to cure infertility, which
    Rachel desperately needed. Leah,
    understanding this, was willing to
    surrender them to Rachel in exchange
    for more time with Yaakov. This shows
    how much Leah valued the time spent
    with her husband, willing to make a
    sacrifice for it.
    This highlights an important
    lesson in a generation where men
    are often ridiculed, such as in media
    that depicts them in degrading ways,
    or advertisements showing them as
    clumsy, bumping into walls, or speaking
    nonsense. These portrayals are part
    of the larger, troubling movements
    emerging worldwide. In contrast, the
    Torah’s outlook emphasizes that men
    should be highly respected. The same
    lesson applies here: just as a wife
    respects her husband, that respect will
    return to her, much like a boomerang.