26 Jul SACRIFICING THE MISSION FOR THE LOVE THE EASTERN SETTLERS: A TALE OF LOVE
In Search for a
Successor.
The Old Man.
Arnold had reached
the age of 105 and
suddenly stopped
going to synagogue.
Worried by Arnold’s
absence after so
many years of faithful attendance, his rabbi went
to see him. He found him in excellent health, so
the Rabbi asked, “How come after all these years
we don’t see you at services anymore?” Arnold
looked around and lowered his voice. “I’ll tell
you, Rabbi,” he whispered. “When I got to be 90,
I expected Hashem to take me any day. But then
I got to be 95, then 100, then 105. So I figured
that G-d is very busy and must have “forgotten”
about me and I don’t want to remind Him.”
The Eastern Colonists The children of Israel are
en route to the Land of Canaan when they are
attacked by the armies of Sichon and Og, whose
domain lay on the eastern bank of the Jordanian
river. Moses leads the Israelites into battle,
defeats the two kings and conquers their land. In
an unexpected turn of events, the tribes of Gad
and Reuben, who own an enormous amount of
sheep and cattle, ask that they be given these
territories, which were prime pastureland, in lieu
of their allotment in the land of Canaan, which
lay to the west of the Jordan. “The descendants
of Reuben and Gad had an extremely large
number of animals,” the Bible relates in this
week’s portion. “And they saw that the Ya’zer
and Gilead areas were good for livestock. The
descendants of Gad and Reuben came and
presented the following petition to Moses… ‘If
we have found favor in your eyes, may this land
be given to your servants for a possession; do
not take us across the Jordan.'” Moses becomes
extremely upset. He gives them a fiery and
dramatic sermon that lasts ten complete verses,
a pretty long stretch in biblical narrative. “Shall
your brothers go to war while you sit here?”
Moses thunders. “Why do you dissuade the
heart of the children of Israel from crossing to
the land that Hashem has given them”? Forty
years earlier, he reminds them, the people of
Israel had been poised to enter the land of
Canaan. But following a negative report by the
spies who were sent to scout the land, the entire
nation spurned the land promised to their
ancestors as the eternal heritage of Israel.
Hashem decreed that they remain in the desert
for forty years, until that entire generation died
out and a new generation prepared to accept the
gift and challenge of the Promised Land. And
now, said Moses to the Reubenites and the
Gadites, you are repeating the sin of the Spies —
a sin which condemned an entire generation and
stopped Jewish history in its tracks for forty
years. Like your parents before you, you are
about to dissuade the heart of your brethren
from entering the land. “You will destroy this
entire nation,” Moses concludes his passionate
rebuke. The Reubenites and Gadites accept
Moses’ words with grace. In response, they
clarify their original position. Far from seeking
to free themselves from the impending
wars for the Land, they were fully
prepared to send their troops into the
Land and take a leading role in the battles
until they were successfully concluded.
Only then would they return to the lands
allotted to them in the east. “We will not
return to our homes until every Israelite
has received his Inheritance,” they
pledge. Moses consents to their plea. He
changes his tone and grants them the
territories they requested. The Questions
Several points in this narrative are
perplexing. First, since their intentions it
seems, were really pure (they never had
in mind to abandon their brethren going
to war), how did Moses misread them so
profoundly and grow so furious with them?
Why did Moses not first inquire what their
intentions were before coming down so hard on
them? Second, Moses’ words focused on the
point that it was unacceptable that one segment
of Jewry isolates from the rest of the nation,
shirking responsibility and escaping the fate of
their brethren. But what about the seemingly
more important point: Hashem wanted the Jews
to settle the land at the west of the Jordan! These
people decided that they wish to remain in the
Trans-Jordan, but who gave these two tribes the
right to redefine the plan and choose the East
instead of the West? Why did Moses consent to
their request? Searching for the Sub-Plot Every
serious student of the Hebrew Bible is aware
that most biblical plots contain sub-plots (often
sub-sub plots), rarely articulated in the narrative
explicitly. Our present tale is no exception:
The explicit narrative is about two tribes of
Israel concerned with their enormous
amount of livestock. Yet the drama in
which this episode is captured in the Torah
somehow gives one a sense that these
tribes were not only concerned about their
cattle; something very personal was at
stake in their request to remain in the
Trans-Jordan. What was it? The Bible
gives us no hint. There is no way of
knowing. We are left in the dark until
Moses is about to leave the world. In the
last section of Deuteronomy, just moments
before his passing, Moses speaks to each
of the twelve tribes of Israel. His words to
the tribe of Gad must be heeded to
carefully: “He [Gad] chose the first portion
[of land available], for that is where the
lawgiver’s plot is hidden.” Unlimited
Loyalty These brief cryptic words, at last,
expose to us the true reason behind Gad’s
insistence to settle the territory to the East
of the Jordan. Moses, the lawgiver, was
destined to die in the East and never to
cross the Jordan. Gad pined to remain with
Moses. Gad would not allow Moses’
burial plot to remain isolated in the plains
of Moab devoid of the presence of even a
single Jew. The cry of Gad and Reuben
“Do not take us across the Jordan,” was a
plea not to separate them from Moses. If
Moses is not destined to cross the river,
they too did not wish to cross it. These
were no mere farmers worrying about
real-estate. These were souls so deeply
attached to their Rebbe who were
determined to spend their lives near the
resting place of Moses. Moses’ Intuition
Moses, clearly, did not anticipate such a
movement. When the members of the
tribes of Gad and Reuben approached him
with their request, they naturally could not
communicate the entire truth. They would
not talk to Moses about his own death and
his gravesite. Instead, they discussed
secondary, albeit not dishonest,
motivations, namely the fate of their abundant
cattle. Moses, in his intuition, felt that what they
were expressing to him did not capture the entire
story. Moses sensed that their words eclipsed a
deeper truth. He thus suspected them in
contriving a scheme designed to escape
responsibility. Hence, he rebuked them severely.
Yet surprisingly, they accepted Moses’ words in
grace. The narrative makes it clear that they were
not upset by the false accusations Moses thrust
upon them. Why not? Because they knew that
they were not being straightforward. Above all,
this was not about them and their ego; it was
about their selfless love and dedication to
Moses. His fury did not alienate them, it merely
demonstrated once again the genuine leader
Moses was and strengthened their resolve to
remain in his proximity for eternity. Moses
agreed to fulfill their request. He could not tear
himself away from the people he dedicated his
life to. If his people reciprocated the love he
showered upon them, he would not be the one to
expel them from his midst. And at the last
moments before his death, he extols Gad for this
deeply loving choice. The mistake Yet, after all
is said, rabbinic commentary does criticize the
Reubenites and Gadites for their decision to
remain in the Trans-Jordan. The verse in
Proverbs, “If an inheritance is seized hastily in
the beginning, its end will not be blessed,” is
applied in the Midrash to the two tribes who
seized the territory to the East of the Jordan.
Centuries later, when the Jews are exiled from
their land through the Assyrian and later
Babylonian empires, it is these two tribes who
are the first to be exiled from their land. Why?
Notwithstanding the noble and deeply moving
intentions of Gad and Reuben, their choice is
considered “hasty” and immature. It was
emotionally compelling and profoundly
moving, but spiritually short sighted. Yes, Gad
and Reuben could not abandon Moses’ burial
place. They were determined to remain in the
proximity of Moses’ body. Yet they failed to
realize that Moses’ true presence would not
remain interred in the earth of the plains of
Moab. Moses would continue to live on in his
vision, in his ideas, in his teachings. And Moses
vision was that the Jewish people fulfill their
Hashem given mandate to enter the Land of
Canaan, settle it and transform it into a Holy
Land, redefining the physical landscape of the
land as an abode for Hashemliness. Moses was
never comprised of simple matter so that his
identity would be defined merely in terms of his
physical body. Moses’ life embodied a truth, a
vision, a way of looking at the world and
understanding the objective of man’s journey on
this earth. As long as that truth would live in the
hearts of people dedicated to Moses’ dream of
transforming the earthy land of Canaan into a
divine landscape, Moses would remain alive. To
be in the physical presence of Moses is great.
Greater yet is to leave his presence and fulfill his
mission to settle the Holy Land.