Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    THE CORRECT BERACHA ON WRAPS

    And Avraham
    hurried to the tent
    to Sarah, and he
    said, quickly bring
    three sa’ah of fine
    flour, knead it and
    make loaves.

    Bereishis 18:6
    Hilchos Berachos are extremely
    important since they apply every day of
    our lives, and yet they are also quite
    complex. People are always coming up
    with new foods and eating styles, leading
    to ongoing halachic questions that poskim
    must address. These questions often
    result in a range of halachic opinions. A
    frequently debated food in recent
    discussions is the wrap, with varying
    opinions on the proper beracha to recite.
    A wrap is generally produced in a manner
    similar, but not identical, to bread. The
    main ingredients are typically wheat flour
    and water, which are kneaded into a thin
    dough, and baked on a pan with just
    enough oil to prevent it from sticking to
    the pan. At first glance it would seem that
    the beracha on such an item should be
    hamotzi, just as it would be on any other
    bread product. Yet, some poskim maintain
    that it is mezonos. What is the basis for
    this machlokes?
    Pas Haba’ah B’Kisnin — Rishonim
    and Acharonim
    The correct beracha for wraps primarily
    depends upon one’s understanding of the
    sugya of pas haba’ah b’kisnin (Berachos
    42a). The Gemara says that there is a kind
    of “bread,” referred to as pas haba’ah
    b’kisnin, which is different than typical
    bread. Thus, if one only eats a small
    amount of it, he recites mezonos, and if
    the person eats a large amount to be
    kovei’a seudah (to establish a meal) on it,
    he recites hamotzi. However, the Gemara
    doesn’t define or describe which baked
    items would fall under this category, and
    the rishonim quote three primary opinions
    on the matter.
    1. Rabbeinu Chananel (cited in Rabbeinu
    Yonah 29a s.v. She’Ein) explains that pas
    haba’ah b’kisnin refers to a bread-like
    dough that has been shaped into a pocket,
    into which a sweet filling is baked. An
    example of this would be a cheese danish,
    pizza pocket, or empanada, but with a
    fruit or other sweet filling.
    2. Rashi and the Rambam (Hil. Berachos
    3:9) explain that it refers to a bread-like
    dough to which many additional

    sweeteners and ingredients are added
    during the mixing process, so that the
    result no longer serves the purpose of
    bread and is eaten as a treat. An example
    of this is cake.
    3. The Aruch (erech kisin) suggests in the
    name of Rav Hai Gaon that it refers to
    crackers. A cracker can have the same
    ingredients as bread, but since it is thin
    and brittle, it is eaten as a snack rather
    than as a staple of a meal.
    The Beis Yosef (O.C. 168:7) cites all
    three of these opinions and concludes that
    since the dispute is not resolved and we
    have a rule of safek berachos l’hakel, we
    recite mezonos on all three of these types
    of baked items. This is codified in the
    Shulchan Aruch.
    The simple reading of the Beis Yosef
    implies that he understood that the three
    opinions of the rishonim are mutually
    exclusive. Each understood that there is
    an objective definition for pas haba’ah
    b’kisnin, and any baked item that doesn’t
    fit into their definition would be
    considered bread and require a hamotzi.
    We recite mezonos on all three categories
    only out of doubt because we don’t know
    who is correct. Indeed, this is the
    understanding of the Shulchan Aruch
    HaRav (168:9), Chayei Adam (54:7),
    Dagul Mervavah, and Rav Akiva Eiger
    (notes to Shulchan Aruch).
    However, other acharonim, including the
    Ma’amar Mordechai (168:14), Nesivos
    (notes to his Derech HaChaim Siddur),
    and the Aruch HaShulchan (168:23)
    understand that the three different
    opinions fundamentally agree. The basic
    point is that only typical bread, which is
    generally reserved for meals, is
    automatically hamotzi. However, for
    other baked items that people eat as both
    snacks and as part of a meal, the beracha
    will depend on how and why the person is
    eating it. If the person is eating a relatively
    small amount, more of a snack, the
    beracha is mezonos, but if the person eats
    a large amount to be kovei’a seudah, the
    beracha is hamotzi. Each rishon is simply
    giving one example of such a baked
    “snack”. According to this understanding,
    we could also extend the category of pas
    haba’ah b’kisnin beyond these three
    categories to other baked items that
    people eat outside of meals.
    Meal Foods and Snack Foods
    Rav Yitzchak Mordechai Rubin, author
    of Orchos Shabbos, argues emphatically

    in Tzohar (vol. 8, p. 756) that we should
    follow the Ma’amar Mordechai’s
    approach, which distinguishes between
    bread and pas haba’ah b’kisnin based on
    whether the food is typically consumed as
    part of a meal or as a snack, rather than
    relying on the specific, objective
    definitions given by the rishonim. He
    offers a number of proofs, which include:
    1. When the Rashba (42b s.v. Nimtza)
    discusses the opinions found in the
    rishonim, he seems to intermingle the
    words of Rashi and Rabbeinu Chananel
    together, without distinguishing between
    what would seem to be two very different
    definitions. This indicates that he saw
    them as merely two examples of the same
    principle.
    2. If one were to eat a snack that included
    small amounts of all three types of pas
    haba’ah b’kisnin, according to the
    objective definitions there would no
    longer be a safek, and he would be
    obligated to wash and bentch on such a
    snack. Rav Rubin argues that since no
    one practically would rule in this way, we
    clearly view all three types as snack
    foods, like the understanding that the
    three opinions are not mutually exclusive,
    and we therefore recite a mezonos even
    when eating all three of them.
    3. Nowadays, it is common to eat coffee
    and cake together. When doing so, one
    recites a mezonos on the cake first, and
    then a shehakol on the coffee. If it were
    true that cake is really a safek hamotzi
    though, one shouldn’t recite a beracha on
    the coffee at all, since it is possible that
    the cake is bread, and its beracha covers
    the coffee as well. Therefore, one should
    presumably make a shehakol on the
    coffee first to avoid this issue. However,
    since nobody does this, it is clear that we
    follow the Ma’amar Mordechai’s view,
    that cake is an example of pas haba’ah
    b’kisnin without any doubt, and its
    beracha is not a safek between mezonos
    and hamotzi.
    4. Ashkenazim recite hamotzi over
    matzah all year round, even though
    according to Rav Hai Gaon it should be
    mezonos, since it is hard and brittle like a
    cracker. The only justification for this is
    that pas haba’ah b’kisnin does not have
    an objective standard but rather depends
    on if it is a snack-like or meal food. Since
    matzah is a meal food (at least on Pesach),
    it is considered bread and requires a
    hamotzi.

    Wraps and the Poskim Today
    Rav Rubin argues that people only eat
    wraps with other foods in them, but never
    by themselves. He argues that therefore
    they cannot be considered “bread,” which
    is a staple food that can be eaten by itself.
    Based on the understanding that the three
    categories of pas haba’ah b’kisnin are not
    exhaustive but just examples, Rav Rubin
    rules that we should treat wraps in the
    same way and their beracha is therefore
    mezonos.
    Rav Mordechai Willig objects to this
    chiddush on two grounds. First, why
    would we assume that the definition of
    pas haba’ah b’kisnin hinges on whether
    something is eaten independently or as
    part of a sandwich? The critical question
    is whether a baked item is a meal food or
    a snack food, and a wrap, even if never
    eaten alone, is certainly the type of
    “bread” that people eat almost exclusively
    as part of a meal. Second, despite Rav
    Rubin’s research, it is debatable that
    wraps are never eaten alone, even if their
    primary mode of consumption is as a
    container for their filling. Rav Willig
    therefore paskens that wraps are always
    hamotzi. This is also the psak of Rav
    Binyamin Forst, Rav Yisrael Belsky z”l,
    and it is the policy of the OU. Rav Yisroel
    Belsky (cited on oukosher.org) points out
    that although most wraps are hamotzi, if a
    wrap has a very doughy texture and is not
    tasty when eaten alone, it cannot be
    considered bread and would be a mezonos
    if not eaten in the context of a meal.
    However, even such a wrap would be
    hamotzi when used to hold a filling as
    part of a meal. Similarly, Rav Shmuel
    Fuerst, a leading posek from Chicago,
    makes a distinction between normal
    colored wraps, which are hamotzi, and
    those that are colored orange or green,
    and therefore bear less of a resemblance
    to bread, which are mezonos.