Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    TRAVELING ON SUKKOT: INSIGHTS FROM MY UPCOMING BOOK; THE TRAVELER’S GUIDE

    A person is permitted
    to go on outings during
    Sukkot and to eat
    outside the sukkah
    when necessary for
    refreshment or for the
    sake of Shalom Bayit.
    The Gemara (Sukkah 26a) teaches that travelers
    (holkhei derakhim) are exempt from the
    sukkah, as derived from the pasuk, “You shall
    dwell in sukkot for seven days.” Our Sages
    expound: “Dwell as you live.” This means that
    the mitzvah of sukkah is to dwell in it as one
    would in his own home. Just as a person does
    not refrain throughout the year from leaving his
    house for business or other needs, so too,
    during the festival, the Torah did not require
    one to avoid travel (Rashi).
    Therefore, it would seem that going on a trip is
    permitted. Indeed, this was the opinion of
    Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, Rabbi Nissim
    Karelitz (Chut Shani, Sukkah p. 267), and
    Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch (Teshuvot
    VeHanhagot, vol. 6 §146).
    However, several leading halachic authorities
    ruled otherwise, such as Rabbi Moshe Feinstein
    (Igrot Moshe, O.C. vol. 3 §93), Rabbi Shlomo
    Zalman Auerbach (quoted in Sefer HaSukkah,
    vol. 2 p. 905), and Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
    (Yechaveh Da’at, vol. 3 §47). They maintain
    that the exemption for travelers applies only to
    one who travels for a necessary purpose, not
    for leisure or pleasure.
    Even those who permit traveling note that one
    should not lightly forgo such an important
    mitzvah merely for the sake of a trip. Therefore,
    it is proper to check in advance where a sukkah
    might be available along the way.
    In our times, however, many families go on
    outings during Chol HaMoed. While such trips
    are often for enjoyment, they frequently serve
    an important need — to refresh oneself and to
    spend meaningful time with one’s spouse and
    children.
    Indeed, circumstances have changed. In
    previous generations, people found enjoyment
    in remaining at home or visiting friends and
    family. Today, many feel a genuine need to go
    out; otherwise, family harmony may be
    disrupted — children become restless, and the
    wife may strongly desire to leave the house.
    Likewise, a person himself often needs a break
    from daily pressures.
    The language of the stricter authorities is also
    telling — they objected to trips taken solely for
    pleasure. It follows that if a trip fulfills a
    genuine need, it may be permitted. As noted in
    Noam (vol. 24 p. 244), for some individuals,
    travel constitutes a physical or emotional
    necessity, and may even be part of fulfilling the
    mitzvah of “Vesamachta bechagecha” —
    rejoicing on the festival — and sometimes also
    the mitzvah of shalom bayit.
    Nonetheless, one must take care not to spend
    the majority of the festival outside the sukkah,
    lest the special days lose their meaning and
    become like ordinary weekdays.
    Although our Sages praised those who remain

    at home during Yomtov and Chol HaMoed, one
    is permitted to go on outings with his family.
    Rabbi Eliezer says (Sukkah 27b): I praise the
    lazy ones who do not leave their homes on the
    festival, as it is written: ‘And you shall rejoice,
    you and your household.’ Rashi explains:
    “Even though they remain home not for the
    sake of the festival but out of laziness,
    nevertheless I praise them.” The Gemara
    qualifies this, saying it refers only to one who
    goes away and does not return that day. But if
    he goes and returns the same day, it is not
    lacking, since, as Rashi explains, in that case he
    rejoices in the festival with his wife. From here
    we learn that as long as one is with his wife and
    family, there is no deficiency. Similarly, Rabbi
    Yosef Shaul Nathanson (Divrei Shaul) asks
    how it was that the Sages in the Haggadah were
    gathered in Bnei Brak, including Rabbi Eliezer,
    who made the above statement. He answers
    that the reason to remain home is for the joy of
    one’s wife, and on the Seder night this joy is
    not diminished, for the mitzvah to recount the
    Exodus from Egypt occupies the entire night,
    and thus there is no neglect of marital joy. In
    Maggid Meisharim it is explained that perhaps
    those Sages went together with their entire
    households. From all these explanations we
    learn that if one goes on outings together with
    his family, there is no contradiction to Rabbi
    Eliezer’s praise of those who remain home.
    Nevertheless, even though one may go on trips
    during Chol HaMoed, he must preserve the
    sanctity of the festival: wearing holiday
    clothes, eating festive meals, refraining from
    unworthy places, and setting aside time to
    study Torah. The Yerushalmi (quoted in
    Mishnah Berurah 530:2) warns: “If I had
    someone to join me, I would permit work on
    Chol HaMoed. Why is work prohibited? In
    order that people eat, drink, and toil in Torah.
    But now they eat, drink, and act frivolously.”
    The Kol Bo notes that this implies that
    lightheadedness is an even greater transgression
    than performing labor itself, since Hashem’s
    purpose in granting the festival was for us to
    draw close to His reverence and devote
    ourselves to His Torah.
    If one is traveling and has no sukkah, he may
    enter a sukkah built in the public domain, but
    should not recite a blessing over it.
    The Yerushalmi (Sukkah 3:1) relates that
    Gamliel Zuga built a sukkah in the marketplace,
    and Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi asked him,
    “Who permitted you to do this?”—meaning he
    held it was prohibited. The Rema (Orach
    Chaim 637:3) likewise rules that one should
    not build a sukkah on public property.
    The Magen Avraham (cited in Mishnah Berurah
    637:10) wondered how some had the custom to
    build sukkot in the public domain, and
    suggested that even if all Jews would waive
    their rights, gentiles—who also have a share in
    it—certainly would not. He therefore forbade
    building a sukkah in the public domain outside
    of Eretz Yisrael.
    However, the Shu”t Sho’el U’Meishiv (vol. 1,
    siman 124) questioned this based on the fact

    that in the time of Nechemiah, Jews built
    sukkot in public areas (Nechemiah 8:16),
    implying that all Jews waived their rights and
    no gentiles lived there. The Chasam Sofer
    (Sukkah 31) also wrote that when Jews are on
    their own land, gentiles cannot prevent them
    from fulfilling mitzvot. Rav Nissim Karelitz
    (Chut Shani, Sukkah p. 223) rules that in Eretz
    Yisrael, where all are obligated in sukkah, the
    public cannot forbid an individual from
    building in the public domain, and there is no
    need to request municipal permission.
    According to this reasoning, outside Eretz
    Yisrael, building a sukkah in the public domain
    is prohibited.
    The Bikurei Yaakov (637:6) writes that it is
    prohibited to block off alleyways entirely, but
    slightly narrowing the street may be permitted.
    If the sukkah has already been built, the Rema
    rules that one fulfills his obligation in it. The
    Mishnah Berurah cites a dispute whether one
    may recite a blessing: some hold that even
    though it is valid, one should not bless, as it
    would be a berachah levatalah. Since this is a
    matter of dispute and involves a doubt
    concerning blessings, one should refrain from
    reciting the blessing, as ruled in Or LeTzion
    (vol. 4, p. 178).
    One may not sit in a sukkah without the
    owner’s permission.
    The Rema (Orach Chaim 613:3) rules that
    ideally a person should not sit in someone
    else’s sukkah without their knowledge. The
    Mishnah Berurah (s.k. 109) explains that the
    owner might be particular about not having
    others see his business or meals without his
    awareness. If the owners are not home and it is
    impossible to ask for permission, it is assumed
    they would not object, and it is even
    commendable that someone performs a
    mitzvah at their expense. However, if there is a
    possibility that the owner will return while one
    is there, one should not enter, so the owner will
    not be embarrassed eating or conducting
    business in their presence.
    Or LeTzion (vol. 4, p. 168) writes that if one
    cannot ask for permission, entry is permitted,
    provided one is careful to clean up afterward
    and not stay longer than necessary—leaving
    immediately after finishing one’s meal.
    This leniency relies on the assumption that
    most people would not mind, but this
    assumption can change if it is observed that
    people do in fact object.
    Today it appears that most people are particular
    about strangers entering their sukkah. The Kaf
    HaChaim (s.k. 15) adds that if the sukkah is
    furnished with cushions and fine covers, the
    owners are certainly particular, and the best
    practice is to request permission from the
    owner or his wife before entering.
    Additionally, in modern times there is concern
    about entering someone else’s property without
    permission due to potential legal issues, so one
    should respect others’ property rights and not
    enter their courtyard without consent.
    A traveler can construct a sukkah using his car
    and eat there as needed.

    There are several ways to turn a car into a
    sukkah, provided that the halachic requirements
    are met. These are the options:
    A. Two cars When two cars are available, they
    can be parked close together so that the sides of
    the cars form two walls. Since a kosher sukkah
    requires three walls, one may open one of the
    car doors to create a third wall. Afterwards,
    sechach (the roofing) should be placed across
    the top.
    It is important to ensure that no wall is
    suspended above a gap of three tefachim
    (approximately 24 cm / 9.5 inches), as such a
    wall is invalid. Because the underside of a car
    is typically more than three tefachim above the
    ground, one must close off that space — for
    example, by placing boards or objects
    underneath, or by parking next to a raised
    sidewalk so that the gap is less than three
    tefachim.
    In addition, the height of the space beneath the
    sechach must be checked: in such a setup, the
    ceiling often ends up being quite low, so care
    must be taken that the sechach does not descend
    below ten tefachim (about 80 cm / 31.5 inches),
    which would invalidate the sukkah.
    B. One car When only one car is available, it
    can be parked close to a wall or a fence. The car
    and the fence then form two walls, and by
    opening the car door, a third wall is created.
    Here too, one must ensure that the space
    beneath the door is not more than three
    tefachim (about 24 cm), as a gap larger than
    that invalidates the wall.
    C. A car with front and rear doors If the car
    has both a front and rear door, opening both can
    form three walls — the two doors serving as
    additional partitions together with the car’s
    structure.
    D. A car with a sunroof If the car has a
    sunroof, one may open it and place sechach
    over the opening. He may then sit and eat
    beneath it, provided the opening is at least
    seven tefachim wide and long (approximately
    56 cm / 22 inches). It must also be ensured that
    there is a clear space of at least ten tefachim
    (about 80 cm / 31.5 inches) from the seat below
    to the sechach, as this is the minimum halachic
    height of a sukkah.
    Even though the walls of the car are somewhat
    distant from the sechach, this arrangement is
    permissible based on the halachic principle of
    dofen akumah (“curved wall”). According to
    this rule, a non-kosher roofed section adjacent
    to a wall can be considered an extension of that
    wall — up to a distance of four amot
    (approximately two meters) — allowing the
    sechach above to remain valid.