Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    VAYIKRA: LEADERSHIP IS SYNONYMOUS WITH SIN DON’T BE AFRAID TO MAKE MISTAKES

    A man who wants to
    lead the orchestra must
    turn his back on the
    crowd.—Max Lucado
    When, Not If
    This week’s parsha,
    Vayikra (and much of
    the book of Vayikra) is
    about sacrifices, and though these laws have
    been inoperative for almost 2000 years since
    the destruction of the Temple, the moral
    principles they embody and the messages they
    contain are meaningful and inspiring.
    The Torah in this parsha describes the various
    kinds of sin offering, brought in the case of
    inadvertent wrongdoing (shegagah). Four
    different cases are considered: the anointed
    priest (high priest), the community
    (represented by the Sanhedrin or supreme
    court), the Prince (Nasi, Leader, King), and an
    ordinary individual. Because their roles in the
    community were different, so too was the
    form of their atonement.
    In each of the above situations the Torah
    raises the possibility of sin, with one glaring
    exception. In three cases, the law is introduced
    by the Hebrew word “im,” “if.” It is possible
    that a high priest, the community, or an
    individual may err.
    However, when the Torah describes the
    potential sin of a leader (a Nasi) the text reads:
    “When a leader sins…”
    Not if, but when.
    The connotation seems troubling. With
    individual Jews, there is possibility of sin. The
    same can be said for the High Priest and the
    Supreme Court. With leaders, however, there
    is not the possibility of sin, but the probability
    of sin. The question is not if, but when!
    This is how the Zohar on Vayikra and the
    15th-century Italian biblical commentator
    Rabbi Ovadya Seforno understood the
    wording of the verse:
    After all, it is common that he will sin.
    Why such pessimism? There are a few reasons
    for this. At the dawn of history, the Torah
    established a truth most famously verbalized
    centuries later by the nineteenth-century
    moralist Lord John Emerich Edward Dalberg
    Acton, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute
    power corrupts absolutely.”
    Yet, there is more to this. Because of the great
    risks a leader must take, the assumption of a
    leadership position carries with it the
    inevitability of error. “A leader takes people
    where they want to go; a great leader takes
    people where they don’t necessarily want to
    go, but ought to be,” is the old saying. To be a
    leader, to deal with diverse people, to be
    creative, innovative and decisive, to make
    difficult and heart-wrenching decisions,
    guarantees mistakes.
    The leader must, for example, decide whether
    to send his soldiers into battle or keep them
    home. Which decision is correct? Sending
    your soldiers to war will almost certainly
    result in deaths. Keeping them home, may
    allow your enemy to conquer the country.

    These are some of the painstaking decisions
    leaders must make.
    Four Saints
    If sin and leadership are synonymous, does
    the Torah’s moral system discourage the
    assumption of leadership?
    For this we will introduce an enigmatic
    Talmudic passage. The Talmud states:
    Four people died only because of the advice
    of the snake (meaning, they never committed
    any sins, they only died because of Adam and
    Chava eating from the Eitz Hada’as which
    introduced the reality of death into human
    life. Binyamin, the son of Yaakov; Amram the
    father of Moshe; Yishai the father of Dovid,
    and Kileab the son of Dovid.
    There is something amiss here. Think of all
    the great people of our nation who are
    excluded from this list: Avraham, Yitzchak
    and Yaakov; Sara, Rivka, Rochel and Leah;
    the other eleven sons of Yaakov including
    Binyamin’s older and beloved brother Yosef,
    known as Yosef HaTzaddik, Yosef the
    righteous one. Moshe, the greatest prophet,
    teacher and leader of Israel about whom the
    Torah states that “there never arose a prophet
    like Moshe whom G-d knew face to face.”
    Aaron, the Kohen Gadol, Yehoshua, Shmuel,
    and many more, are not on the list. Our
    greatest giants did not make it into the Who’s
    Who list of sinless people. Instead, the list
    consists of four relatively anonymous persons:
    Binyamin, Amram, Yishai and Kileab. Why?
    Also, the Talmudic identification of each of
    these four individuals is strange. Each of them
    is mentioned with his father’s name or his
    son’s name. Why doesn’t the Talmud simply
    list their names as it does with most biblical
    characters? Why identify each historical
    figure by his relationship to another:
    Binyamin, the son of Yaakov; Amram, the
    father of Moshe; Yishai, the father of Dovid;
    Kileab, the son of Dovid?
    The Talmud intimates an extraordinary idea:
    Our greatest heroes are not the ones who
    never sinned, but rather the ones who actually
    committed mistakes (relative to their spiritual
    level). Because when you are a leader it is not
    a question of “if” but of “when.”
    Binyamin, Amram, Yishai and Kileab all died
    sinless because they lived a life of isolation.
    They did not deal much with people; they did
    not take responsibility for the generation; they
    did not get enmeshed in the affairs of the
    community. In short, they did not get their
    hands dirty; hence they remained untarnished.
    Yaakov, Moshe, and Dovid are not said to
    have died only “due to the snake.” According
    to the Torah, Avraham, Yaakov, and Moshe
    committed mistakes—relative to their sublime
    state of spiritual greatness. Relative to their
    standing, there was some form of “cheit”—
    lack and void Why? Not because they were
    not noble and holy men; but because they
    were leaders in a really crazy world, and by
    the very nature of their role, perfection is
    impossible.
    This may be why the Talmud gives us the

    names of each of these four saints with another
    name. In a rather elegant way, the Talmud
    wants us to compare each of these four saintly
    spotless individuals to a more well-known
    relative: Yaakov, Moshe, and Dovid. It wants
    us to recall that despite the greatness of these
    four men, our greatest honor is reserved to
    these other relatives, who made it their
    responsibility to illuminate a dark world.
    The Hermit
    If you are a hermit, if you don’t do anything,
    you will never be criticized, nor will you
    make mistakes. Inaction, by definition, does
    not lend itself to error. Action always lends
    itself to error. When you do things, you will be
    scrutinized and criticized; someone will
    always have what to say and you are prone to
    error. So although we have a place in our
    hearts for the four individuals who never
    sinned, because they remained aloof; although
    we pay tribute to spiritual saints who don’t
    hurt a fly and remain immaculate, and we
    ought to learn from them and be inspired by
    them, nonetheless we remind ourselves of
    those individuals who were even greater than
    the sinless saints—because they did “sin,”
    because they did commit errors. They went
    out and made a radical difference in people’s
    lives; they sought to change the world.
    I recall standing one Shabbos afternoon in a
    synagogue in the Old City of Jerusalem. A
    man approached the great sage Rabbi Adin
    Even Yisroel (Shteinsaltz) and asked him if he
    had any regrets in life. Rabbi Adin responded:
    I made many mistakes, and I regret them. But
    I regret far more all those things I never tried
    out of fear of making a mistake…
    Or as Les Brown put it: “Most people fail in
    life not because they aim too high and miss,
    but because they aim too low and hit.”
    Marriage & Parenting
    Consider marriage and parenting. If you
    choose to remain single, you will never have
    an argument in your home, never experience
    strife and discord, and nobody will ever
    accuse you of being “insensitive, selfish,
    careless, irresponsible, narcissistic, and ‘out
    for lunch.’ If you decide not to have children,
    no one will accuse you of being a horrible
    parent, a controlling mother, ruining the lives
    of your children, crippling them emotionally,
    and sending them into therapy for decades.
    Yet we were created not to be perfect—angels
    and souls in heaven are perfect. We were
    created to jump into the circus of life, make
    mistakes and learn from them, to get entangled
    in the thicket of life and then come out
    stronger.
    But there is one condition. We need not be
    perfect, but we must be accountable.
    Mazal Tov
    That is the reason for the strange Jewish
    custom that after the breaking of the glass at
    the end of the marriage ceremony, everyone
    screams, “Mazal Tov!” What’s the mazal tov?
    A nice glass was broken, after all.
    There is a moving message here we are
    conveying to the new bride. “You see your

    groom? Now he’s perfect. He’s handsome,
    flawless, and impeccable. He is the dream of
    your life. But sooner or later, he will begin
    breaking things… You know what you do
    when he begins breaking things? Say Mazal
    Tov! Mazal tov that I am married to a real
    human being who is imperfect.
    This is how Judaism understood the concept
    of sin—as an opportunity for rebirth. Much of
    Vayikra revolves around this theme of sin and
    atonement. It is as though G-d is telling us: I
    know you are human. Humans are not perfect.
    I made you that way. And I love you anyway.
    In fact, that’s why I love you—because you
    are not perfect. I already had perfection before
    I created you. What I want from creation is an
    imperfect world that strives to improve, filled
    with human beings that fail, get up and move
    ahead. By being imperfect but persevering
    nevertheless, you have fulfilled the purpose of
    your creation. You have achieved the one
    thing that I can’t do without you—you have
    brought the perfect G-d into an imperfect
    world.
    Failing at our mission is itself a part of the
    mission, as long as we can rise up and continue
    moving, with the newly discovered wisdom
    from our failures.
    The Price of Leadership
    “The price of greatness is responsibility,”
    Winston Churchill said. We might add: The
    price of leadership is sin. As long as you are
    accountable, honest and ready to learn from
    past errors, fear not the fact that you will
    stumble.
    This is the Torah’s message in Vayikra.
    Leaders make mistakes. That is inevitable.
    Now their job is not to run and hide; but to
    face the mistakes, acknowledge them, and
    bring atonement.
    “A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what
    ships are built for,” William Shedo said. Each
    of us is called on to be a leader, a “Nasi,” in
    our own way, a beacon of influence, an
    ambassador of love, wisdom, light, and hope.
    Get out of the harbor into the sea. We know
    you will break a thing or two in the process.
    When you do, we will scream Mazal Tov and
    move on.
    Don’t be afraid of making mistakes. Just make
    sure two things: 1) they are new mistakes; not
    the same old ones. 2) That you know how to
    say I am sorry and learn from your mistakes to
    create a brighter future.
    A person who makes no mistakes, generally
    makes nothing. Yet a person who makes
    mistakes and then justifies them must resign
    from every form of leadership.