Have Questions or Comments?
Leave us some feedback and we'll reply back!

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone Number)

    In Reference to

    Your Message


    SPEAK YOUR VUES WITH THE VUES MASTER

    Please note that the author of Speak Your Vues is in no way affiliated with the publisher of
    this paper. The author of this column is an independent third party contributor. The views and
    opinions expressed by this author may not reflect the views and opinions of the publishers. If
    one has any issues with any of the views, please write a letter to the Vues Master.

    SAFETY
    Dear Vues Master:

    A tragic accident in Brooklyn’s Marine Park neighbor-
    hood should serve as a wake-up call. A motorized scooter

    rider was fatally struck despite heroic efforts by Hatzolah
    and hospital staff. He was a member of our community,
    and his loss has shaken many.
    The growing use of motorized scooters—especially among
    yeshiva boys—poses serious dangers. Sharing busy roads
    with limited protection and visibility can be deadly.
    Parents, rabbonim, and community leaders must address

    this issue urgently. Stronger safety rules, helmet use, en-
    forcement, and safer transportation alternatives must be

    considered.
    If even one life is saved through awareness, this loss will
    not have been in vain.
    LT
    Vues Master’s Note: May his memory be a reminder for
    all of us.

    ANTI SEMITE
    Dear Vues Master:

    It is deeply concerning that Tucker Carlson, recently la-
    beled “Anti Semite of the Year,” received public support,

    or at least a lack of condemnation, from Vice President
    JD Vance at the Turning Point USA conference. At a time

    when public figures are rightly held accountable for rheto-
    ric that can fuel hatred, it is notable that the Vice President

    of the United States, and a leading contender for the 2028
    presidential election, declined to denounce an individual
    accused of promoting antisemitism.
    This omission is more than a political footnote. It signals
    to the public that serious allegations of prejudice may be
    overlooked when convenient, raising questions about the

    values and priorities of those in the highest offices. Anti-
    semitism is not a partisan issue; it is a moral one. Leaders

    have a responsibility to call out hate speech and stand in
    solidarity with marginalized communities. Silence, in this

    context, can be interpreted as tacit approval or, at mini-
    mum, a troubling tolerance of harmful rhetoric.

    As Americans prepare for future elections, it is critical
    that candidates demonstrate not only political acumen but
    also ethical clarity. How leaders respond to accusations of

    bigotry reflects the standards they will uphold if entrust-
    ed with the nation’s highest offices. The public deserves

    transparency, accountability, and unequivocal denuncia-
    tion of hate, regardless of political alignment.

    Failing to confront antisemitism sends a dangerous mes-
    sage: that political expediency can outweigh moral re-
    sponsibility. Our leaders must remember that words have

    power, and inaction in the face of hate has consequences
    for us all.
    DT
    Vues Master’s Note: He is the worst of the worst!

    ANTI SEMITE #1
    Dear Vues Master:
    Tucker Carlson’s recent conduct illustrates why public

    figures with massive platforms must be held to basic stan-
    dards of responsibility. Carlson is not a fringe provocateur

    shouting into the void; he commands one of the largest
    audiences in American media. When someone with that

    reach repeatedly platforms extremists and traffics in rheto-
    ric long associated with antisemitic conspiracy theories,

    the consequences extend far beyond “just asking ques-
    tions.”

    StopAntisemitism’s decision to name Carlson its 2025
    “Antisemite of the Year” should alarm anyone who cares
    about civic norms. His interview with Nick Fuentes, a
    known Holocaust denier and white nationalist, was not a
    neutral journalistic exercise. It offered legitimacy to ideas
    that have historically fueled discrimination and violence.

    Similarly troubling are Carlson’s attacks on “Christian Zi-
    onists” using dehumanizing language and his praise of so-
    called historians who minimize or distort the Holocaust.

    These choices are not accidental; they reflect a pattern.

    Carlson often couches these moments in irony or skep-
    ticism, allowing him to claim plausible deniability while

    guests push narratives about Jewish “control” or disloy-
    alty. This tactic is especially dangerous because it launders

    bigotry into mainstream conversation, making it seem de-
    batable rather than unacceptable. History shows where

    such normalization leads.
    At a time when antisemitism is rising in schools, online
    spaces, and public life, influential commentators should be
    working to lower the temperature, not inflame it. Criticism
    of governments or policies is fair game. Repeating tropes
    that target Jews as a group is not.
    Media institutions, advertisers, and audiences alike should
    demand better. Free speech does not mean freedom from

    accountability, especially when speech contributes to real-
    world harm. MT

    ]Vues Master’s Note: Disaster of a person!

    DR. KEVORKIAN?
    Dear Vues Master:
    I write with profound disappointment and

    deep alarm at Governor Hochul’s announce-
    ment of her intention to sign the Medical Aid

    in Dying Act, legalizing physician-assisted
    suicide in New York. This decision marks a
    tragic turning point for our state and for how
    we value human life, particularly the lives of
    the most vulnerable among us.
    For more than a decade, Agudath Israel has
    opposed physician-assisted suicide, and that
    opposition remains unwavering today. Over
    the years, the organization has held dozens
    of meetings with legislators, presented public

    testimony, made personal pleas to the gover-
    nor, and issued action alerts that generated

    thousands of calls and emails from concerned
    New Yorkers. Together with our coalition

    partners, these efforts surely delayed this mo-
    ment. That it has now arrived reflects a sober-
    ing societal shift in how life itself is regarded.

    In a letter sent this past July, Agudath Isra-
    el warned the governor that this legislation

    represents a profound paradigm shift in how
    New York treats life and its most vulnerable
    citizens. It raises grave moral, medical, and
    religious concerns that cannot be resolved
    through procedural safeguards alone.

    While we acknowledge the proposed amend-
    ments adding certain protections, allowing

    medical professionals to decline participa-
    tion without penalty and preventing insurers

    from denying end-of-life care, our opposition
    remains steadfast. No set of amendments can

    change the fundamental reality that physi-
    cian-assisted suicide crosses a moral line

    long held to be sacrosanct.
    That line has now been breached. This is,
    simply put, a dark day for New York.
    AT
    Vues Master’s Note: It is amazing how low
    our morals have fallen!

    HOMELESS
    Dear Vues Master:
    I strongly support City Council Member Inna
    Vernikov’s opinion highlighting the dangers
    of Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s decision
    to end homeless encampment sweeps. While

    empathy for those experiencing homeless-
    ness is important, abandoning policies that

    maintain public safety and provide access to

    shelter is neither compassionate nor practi-
    cal.

    During the Adams administration, encamp-
    ment sweeps were conducted in a coordinat-
    ed manner, pairing NYPD officers with so-
    cial workers and organizations like Breaking

    Ground—to offer services and move home-
    less individuals into shelters. This approach

    balanced the dignity of those in need with
    the safety and quality of life of the broader

    community. Many individuals accepted as-
    sistance and left the streets for shelters, a tan-
    gible outcome of a policy that worked.

    Mamdani’s plan, by contrast, removes the

    enforcement component, leaving tents, un-
    sanitary conditions, drugs, and needles un-
    checked. This policy reversal does not em-
    power the homeless, it traps them in unsafe

    conditions, and simultaneously jeopardizes
    neighborhood safety, property values, and

    the city’s livability. Encampments will per-
    sist unchecked near schools, parks, and pub-
    lic spaces, creating public health and safety

    hazards.

    True compassion involves combining out-
    reach, shelter placement, and public safety,

    not relying solely on slogans or hashtags.
    Ending encampment sweeps is reckless and

    inhumane, and it ignores the realities of ur-
    ban homelessness. A practical, humane solu-
    tion must include continued street outreach,

    access to shelter, and enforcement when nec-
    essary. We cannot sacrifice quality of life or

    safety under the guise of empathy.
    IW

    Vues Master’s Note: New York’s homeless-
    ness problem under Mamdani will be worse

    than California’s. When is Inna running for
    mayor?

    CHANUKAH
    Dear Vues Master:
    I wanted to take a moment to express how

    much I thoroughly enjoyed the last two Cha-
    nukah editions of The Jewish Vues. Every is-
    sue was an absolute delight to read! I loved

    all the columns—they were thoughtful, en-
    gaging, and covered a wide variety

    of topics that really resonated with

    me and my family. The fun ques-
    tions and jokes added a wonderful

    touch of humor that kept us smiling
    every day.
    Chanukah itself was truly magical
    this year. My family celebrated with
    joy and warmth, hosting parties and

    gathering together to honor the holi-
    day’s traditions. The Jewish Vues

    made our celebrations even more
    special. We relied on it to purchase
    delicious food and thoughtful gifts,

    and everything we chose was per-
    fect.

    I especially loved all the pictures in the pa-
    per; they really brought the stories and arti-
    cles to life! It’s wonderful how your publica-
    tion combines meaningful content with such

    engaging visuals.

    I also appreciated how The Jewish Vues re-
    flects the spirit and values of our commu-
    nity. From insightful commentary to playful

    features, every page made me feel proud to
    be part of this vibrant community. I look

    forward to each issue and always find some-
    thing to enjoy and share with my family and

    friends.
    Thank you to the entire team for creating
    such a wonderful, engaging, and uplifting
    publication. It truly added joy and meaning to
    our Chanukah celebrations, and I can’t wait
    to see what future issues bring!
    MR
    Vues Master’s Note: We are blushing and

    taking a bow! Thanks for showing apprecia-
    tion!

    KOVOD HATORAH
    Dear Vues Master:
    As we say goodbye to Chanukah this year,
    we unfortunately must witness the Torah
    once again being assaulted by those who seek
    to eradicate it from Eretz Yisrael. Disturbing
    news continues to emerge, with boys being

    arrested, yungerleit beaten, and even a pres-
    tigious Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Avraham Idan, at-
    tacked and verbally degraded by police.

    How is the land of our fathers, our oasis of
    ruchniyus, being controlled by such a terrible

    erev rav? The heart aches seeing lomdei To-
    rah scorned by society. Torah learning, the

    force that sustains the world—is somehow
    the least respected pursuit.
    Ask anyone in any profession to spend eight

    uninterrupted hours in a beis medrash with-
    out taking their eyes off the Gemara, and

    most would struggle to last even one day.

    Those who learn day in and day out, deep-
    ly and with mefarshim, are accomplishing

    something extraordinary. Their devotion to
    Hashem is total.
    Supporting them may not come with plaques
    or public recognition, but it is a gift given
    directly to Hashem. When gedolei hador are
    cut off financially and cry out for help, we
    must not turn away.

    May we see an end to the modern-day Mi-
    syavnim and merit to stand on the right side

    of history.
    KLMY
    Vues Master’s Note: We need Moshiach!

    KEEP THE LIGHT BURNING
    Dear Vues Master:
    There is a form of courage that rarely earns
    applause: challenging falsehoods within
    one’s own camp. That is why Ben Shapiro’s

    recent speech at the Turning Point USA con-
    ference deserves attention.

    Rather than attacking opponents, Shapiro

    confronted conspiracy theories and narra-
    tives detached from evidence, even when

    they veer into antisemitism. He spoke know-
    ing the cost, and spoke anyway.

    This mirrors Parshas Vayigash, when Yehuda
    refuses to accept a false narrative. Chanukah

    teaches the same lesson: truth is not negotia-
    ble. The Menorah’s light symbolizes clarity

    in the face of confusion.
    Truth erodes when silence feels safer than

    honesty. History is shaped by those who con-
    front falsehood, even alone. That courage

    keeps the light alive.
    RMW
    Vues Master’s Note: YES! What a lesson!

    RIVIERA
    Dear Vues Master:
    The reported plan to transform Gaza into a
    high-tech “Riviera of the Middle East” reads
    more like a real estate fantasy than serious
    policy. While rebuilding Gaza is urgent, this
    vision ignores political and security realities.
    The plan depends on Hamas disarming—an
    outcome widely acknowledged as unlikely.
    Donors are also unlikely to invest billions

    without stable governance or security. His-
    tory supports this skepticism.

    The proposal glosses over the immediate hu-
    man reality, offering glossy concepts while

    remaining vague about displacement and
    survival.
    Without legitimate governance and security,
    this plan is not a roadmap to peace, but an
    exercise in denial. TYW
    Vues Master’s Note: Just like Beirut was.

    POLITICS
    Dear Vues Master,

    Like many Republican voters, I was disap-
    pointed by Rep. Elise Stefanik’s withdrawal

    from the governor’s race. Still, her decision
    demonstrates political realism.
    At the same time, I strongly support Nassau

    County Executive Bruce Blakeman. A divid-
    ed primary would have weakened Republi-
    cans against Gov. Hochul. President Trump’s

    endorsement of Blakeman sends a clear mes-
    sage of unity.

    While Stefanik will be missed, consolidat-
    ing behind Blakeman offers the best chance

    to restore accountability and make New York
    safer and more affordable.
    DPL
    Vues Master’s Note: Blakeman is definitely
    going to give Hochul a run for her money!

    PAINTING
    Dear Vues Master:
    It’s not against the law to paint an antisemitic
    mural, But that doesn’t mean a museum is
    required to display it, especially when that
    museum is funded by taxpayers.
    The museum in question is the History
    Colorado Center, a state institution, which
    commissioned a local artist named Mada-

    lyn Drewno to paint a portrait of Denver’s
    Vietnamese immigrant community. Drewno

    decided, instead, to paint a mural showcas-
    ing anti-Israel and anti-Jewish themes, with

    a few Vietnamese Americans thrown in. The
    history center objected, and now Drewno and

    the American Civil Liberties Union are ac-
    cusing the museum of suppressing her right

    to free artistic expression.

    Several scenes in the mural indulge in Holo-
    caust inversion by falsely accusing Israel of

    committing “genocide” in Gaza. One charges
    U.S. Senator Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) with

    “funding genocide” because he supports en-
    abling Israel to defend itself against the mass

    murderers and gang rapists of Hamas.

    It should be noted that comparing Israeli ac-
    tions to those of the Nazis, which is what the

    genocide slur implies, is antisemitic, accord-
    ing to the IHRA definition of antisemitism,

    which the Obama administration began using
    more than fifteen years ago.

    Several of Drewno’s images depict Jew-
    ish money controlling American politicians,

    one of the oldest antisemitic canards in the

    book. In one, U.S. Senator John Hicken-
    looper (D-Colo.) has dollar signs instead of

    eyes. In case anyone misses her meaning,
    Drewno explained to The New York Times

    this week that she was referring to Hicken-
    looper receiving donations from “pro-Israel

    lobbyists.”

    The mural also includes an image of a pro-
    tester holding a sign that reads, “Congress Is

    Not for Sale,” calling to mind the infamous

    claim by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-
    Minn.) that her colleagues support Israel be-
    cause they are bribed by Jews. “It’s all about

    the Benjamins,” Omar declared.

    There are quite a few scenes involving pro-
    testers in Drewno’s mural. Some show them

    waving the official flag of the PLO, a long-
    time symbol of the campaign to destroy Is-
    rael and replace it with “Palestine.” No fewer

    than thirteen PLO flags appear in the paint-
    ing.

    The most ironic aspect of the mural is an im-
    age of someone holding a sign that reads,

    “Sudan Stands with Palestine.” The Biden
    administration labeled the ongoing slaughter

    in Sudan as “genocide” because “Arab mi-
    litias” there “have systematically murdered

    men and boys, even infants, on an ethnic
    basis, and deliberately targeted women and
    girls from certain ethnic groups for rape and
    other forms of brutal sexual violence.” That
    description sounds a lot like October 7.
    In Sudan, Arabs are massacring non-Arabs.

    In southern Israel two years ago, Arabs mas-
    sacred 1,200 non-Arabs. That is why both the

    Arab militias of Sudan and Hamas are guilty
    of genocide.
    Thus, the sign Drewno painted should say

    “Sudan Stands with Israel,” alluding to the

    natural kinship of victims of genocide. In-
    stead, in her mural, perpetrators of genocide

    effectively “stand” with other perpetrators of
    genocide, and Drewno cheers them on. The
    slogan “Sudan Stands with Palestine” will be
    remembered for its painful, unintended irony.

    In its reporting this week on the Drewno con-
    troversy, The New York Times noted that the

    Colorado town of Vail last year canceled the

    artist residency of Danielle SeeWalker be-
    cause, as the paper put it, she “posted a piece

    on social media that reflects her views on the
    war in Gaza.”
    The problem was not that Vail objected to
    artists expressing their views on Gaza. The

    problem was that the piece in question pro-
    moted the same Holocaust-inverting lie as

    Drewno’s mural, that Israel is committing
    genocide in Gaza.

    SeeWalker titled her painting G Is for Geno-
    cide and wrote this accompanying text:

    “Some days I have overwhelming grief &
    guilt for walking around privileged while

    people in Gaza are suffering.” Instead of ex-
    pressing her grief by, say, donating her salary

    to Gazans, SeeWalker opted to invert the Ho-
    locaust and sue Vail when it objected.

    The town of Vail decided to settle SeeWalk-
    er’s suit out of court. It remains to be seen

    whether Drewno will sue the History Colo-
    rado Center.

    It’s difficult to imagine that Drewno has any
    legal grounds to force the taxpayer-funded

    history center to display her antisemitic mu-
    ral. But leaving legal technicalities aside,

    let’s consider the moral angle.

    What if the History Colorado Center com-
    missioned an artist to create a mural about

    the state’s African American community, and
    the artist produced a painting that justified
    lynching and apartheid and glorified white

    supremacists marching through Black neigh-
    borhoods waving racist flags?

    Would that qualify as artistic free expression
    that the public must support and display, or
    would the bigoted mural be shunned?
    In the United States, racist and antisemitic
    artists are free to paint whatever they choose.

    But that does not mean the public must em-
    brace or fund them.

    Dr. Rafael Medoff
    Vues Master’s Note: Museums are run by

    people who study art and are among the big-
    gest antisemites, funded by Muslims.

    MAMDANI’S ADMINISTRATION
    Dear Vues Master

    I am writing to express serious concern re-
    garding the recent Anti-Defamation League

    (ADL) report highlighting troubling connec-
    tions among some of Mayor-elect Zohran

    Mamdani’s transition appointees to anti-
    Zionist and anti-Israel activism. According

    to the report, at least one in five of the more
    than 400 individuals appointed to advisory or
    administrative roles has publicly expressed

    views that the ADL characterizes as anti-Is-
    rael, with some supporting actions that many

    consider extreme or inflammatory.
    While it is important to distinguish between
    legitimate criticism of Israeli government
    policies and antisemitism, the examples cited
    in the report, endorsements of Palestinian
    “resistance” shortly after a deadly Hamas
    attack, public support for hardline activist
    groups, and statements equating Zionism

    with genocide, are deeply troubling. Lead-
    ers and advisors in city government carry the

    responsibility of protecting all New Yorkers,
    and any rhetoric that appears to legitimize
    violence or delegitimize a group’s identity
    undermines that trust.
    New York City thrives on diversity, civic
    engagement, and open dialogue, yet these
    principles require a foundation of mutual

    respect and safety. Citizens deserve trans-
    parency about the values and affiliations of

    those shaping policy and advising the mayor.
    I urge Mayor-elect Mamdani to ensure that

    his administration actively upholds the safe-
    ty, inclusion, and dignity of all communities,

    while clearly denouncing hatred and extrem-
    ism in any form. VT

    Vues Master’s Note: If you think things are
    bad for Jews in New York right now, just wait
    until Mamdani takes office.

    US REGULATORS OK WEGOVY
    PILL FOR WEIGHT LOSS
    Dear Vues Master
    I’m thrilled to hear that U.S. regulators
    have approved a pill version of Wegovy, the
    groundbreaking weight-loss drug! I’ve been
    taking the injectable form, Monjaro, for a

    little over a year now and have seen signifi-
    cant results. It’s helped me shed pounds and

    regain a sense of control over my appetite,
    which has been life-changing.
    That said, the injections are expensive and
    not something I enjoy. The idea of a daily pill
    is incredibly exciting because it could make

    this type of treatment more accessible and af-
    fordable. The convenience alone, no needles,

    no weekly shots, would make it easier for
    people like me to stay consistent. Knowing
    that clinical trials show oral Wegovy offers
    nearly the same weight-loss benefits as the
    injectable version gives me real hope that
    others struggling with obesity might soon
    have a simpler option.
    Cost is always a major concern. Many
    people avoid GLP-1 drugs because of the

    high price, and even though some compa-
    nies are negotiating lower costs, $1,000 a

    month is out of reach for most. A pill that’s
    easier to take and potentially cheaper could
    be a game-changer, expanding access to

    the hundreds of millions of Americans who
    struggle with weight-related health issues.
    This approval is more than just another drug

    on the market, it’s a sign of progress in mak-
    ing effective obesity treatment practical for

    everyday people. I’m excited for the day
    when managing weight doesn’t have to come
    with needles or a massive price tag. MS
    Vues Master’s Note: Sounds great, as long as
    it’s healthy.

    MONEY TALKS
    Dear Vues Master
    I am writing to express my disappointment
    with the way some yeshiva administrations
    treat families based on financial status. As a
    parent who does not have significant means,

    I have noticed a troubling pattern, when I at-
    tempt to communicate with the administra-
    tion regarding my son’s education or needs,

    I am often met with indifference or outright
    dismissal. In contrast, parents who are able to
    contribute more financially are treated with
    warmth, respect, and genuine attentiveness.
    It is disheartening to feel that my family’s

    financial limitations affect the level of atten-
    tion and care my son receives. Every child

    deserves to feel valued and supported, re-
    gardless of their family’s bank account. Edu-
    cation should not be influenced by wealth,

    and the role of a school administration is to
    ensure that all students and their families are
    treated equitably.

    I urge yeshiva administrations, and all edu-
    cational institutions, to reflect on this behav-
    ior. Policies and attitudes that favor wealthier

    parents create unnecessary divisions within
    a community and send a message that some
    children and families matter less than others.
    It is my hope that by raising awareness,

    schools can recommit to fairness and inclu-
    sivity, so that every parent and student feels

    welcomed and respected. No family should

    have to worry that financial status will de-
    termine the quality of attention or care their

    child receives. ZJ
    Vues Master’s Note: Unfortunately, this is
    how the world works. It shouldn’t be this
    way, especially in our yeshivas. But when a
    parent with money walks into a yeshiva, the
    administration sees dollars and wants them,

    so they end up giving those parents more at-
    tention.